Aim: Despite increasing interest in reduction of surgical site infection (SSI) after caesarean section, there is limited evidence around optimal dressing choice. We report the experience of a secondary hospital in regional New Zealand changing from a basic contact dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing over a three-month period, reporting SSI rates, midwifery and nursing experience, and cost.
Method: A retrospective cohort study of hydrocolloid dressings for caesarean sections over three months, compared with basic contact dressings in caesarean sections in the same period one year previously. We report wound swabs with significant growth; results from a survey sent to midwifery and nursing staff; and cost per dressing, as well as the number of dressing changes before discharge.
Results: In the hydrocolloid group (n=94) four patients had significant growth on wound swabs (4.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0-10.6%) compared with six patients in the basic contact group (n=117) (5.1%, 95% CI: 1.0-7.1%). Only 9/20 (45%) midwives reported that they liked the hydrocolloid dressings, compared with 19/21 (90%) liking the basic contact dressings, primarily due to difficulty removing the dressings. When accounting for the number of dressing changes on the ward, the cost per caesarean section was $5.11 NZD for hydrocolloid dressings, compared with $5.72 NZD for basic contact dressings.
Conclusion: Our initial experience with a change to hydrocolloid dressings showed promising results with regard to SSI rates, as well as a cost reduction. This, however, is to be balanced with dressings that are potentially more difficult to remove, resulting in reduced midwifery and nursing satisfaction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.4.200 | DOI Listing |
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
December 2024
School of Nursing & Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Br J Nurs
November 2024
Senior Lecturer, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, aby.
The increasing incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) following caesarean sections highlights the necessity for updated protocols that address risk factors throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) and hydrocolloid dressings have demonstrated potential for improving wound management and reducing complications, particularly by enhancing dressing integrity. Nevertheless, the application of NPWT requires careful consideration and adherence to local trust guidelines to ensure both its safety and efficacy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Craniofac Surg
October 2024
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea.
Background: Wound healing is a complex process influenced by a variety of environmental factors. Dressing materials play a critical role in creating barriers against contaminants, maintaining optimal moisture levels, and absorbing wound exudate. Therefore, selecting materials tailored to wound characteristics is crucial for enhancing outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomed Mater
November 2024
Medical Information College, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, People's Republic of China.
As the incidence of chronic wounds increases, the requirements for wound dressings are rising. The specific aim of this study is to propose a novel gallic acid (GA) functionalized silk fibroin (SF) and gelatin (Gel) composite wound dressing in which GA is used as an antibacterial and wound healing substance. Via electrospinning, SF, Gel, and GA mixed solutions could be conveniently fabricated into a composite nanofiber mat (SF-Gel-GA), consisting of uniform fibers with an average diameter around 134.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Biol Macromol
November 2024
Hubei Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials, Key Laboratory for the Green Preparation and Application of Functional Materials (Ministry of Education), Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Organic Chemical Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!