Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Growing evidence shows that endocrine disruptors (EDs), known to affect the reproductive system, may also disturb other hormone-regulated functions leading to cancers, neurodevelopmental defects, metabolic and immune diseases. To reduce exposure to EDs and limit their health effects, development of screening and mechanism-based assays to identify EDs is encouraged. Nevertheless, the crucial validation step of test methods by regulatory bodies is a time- and resource-consuming process. One of the main raisons of this long duration process is that method developers, mainly researchers, are not fully aware of the regulatory needs to validate a test. We propose an online self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) called ReadEDTest easy to be used by all researchers. The aim of ReadEDTest is to speed up the validation process by assessing readiness criteria of in vitro and fish embryo ED test methods under development. The SAQ is divided into 7 sections and 13 sub-sections containing essential information requested by the validating bodies. The readiness of the tests can be assessed by specific score limits for each sub-section. Results are displayed via a graphical representation to help identification of the sub-sections having sufficient or insufficient information. The relevance of the proposed innovative tool was supported using two test methods already validated by the OECD and four under development test methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107910 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!