AI Article Synopsis
- The study investigates the effectiveness of different airway management techniques (bag-mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and supraglottic airway) during prehospital resuscitation in children who experience cardiac arrest.
- The analysis included five studies with a total of 4,852 pediatric patients, revealing that bag-mask ventilation was associated with better survival rates compared to endotracheal intubation, although the certainty of these results is low.
- The findings indicate that bag-mask ventilation may be the most effective airway management option for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but the overall evidence from the studies is limited and not definitive.
Article Abstract
Objectives: Although airway management is important in pediatric resuscitation, the effectiveness of bag-mask ventilation (BMV) and advanced airway management (AAM), such as endotracheal intubation (ETI) and supraglottic airway (SGA) devices, for prehospital resuscitation of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the efficacy of AAM during prehospital resuscitation of pediatric OHCA cases.
Methods: We searched four databases from their inception to November 2022 and included randomized controlled trials and observational studies with appropriate adjustments for confounders that evaluated prehospital AAM for OHCA in children aged <18 years in quantitative synthesis. We compared three interventions (BMV, ETI, and SGA) via network meta-analysis using the GRADE Working Group approach. The outcome measures were survival and favorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge or 1 month after cardiac arrest.
Results: Five studies (including one clinical trial and four cohort studies with rigorous confounding adjustment) involving 4852 patients were analyzed in our quantitative synthesis. Compared with ETI, BMV was associated with survival (relative risk [RR] 0.44 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.25-0.77]) (very low certainty). There were no significant association with survival in the other comparisons (SGA vs. BMV: RR 0.62 [95% CI 0.33-1.15] [low certainty], ETI vs. SGA: RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.39-1.32] [very low certainty]). There was no significant association with favorable neurological outcomes in any comparison (ETI vs. BMV: RR 0.33 [95% CI 0.11-1.02]; SGA vs. BMV: RR 0.50 [95% CI 0.14-1.80]; ETI vs. SGA: RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.18-2.46]) (all very low certainty). In the ranking analysis, the hierarches for efficacy for survival and favorable neurological outcome were BMV > SGA > ETI.
Conclusion: Although the available evidence is from observational studies and its certainty is low to very low, prehospital AAM for pediatric OHCA did not improve outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.03.049 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!