Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The classic definition of antimicrobial susceptibility to antifungal drugs ignores the persistence of subpopulations that survive in the presence of a drug. Even in entirely clonal populations, small subpopulations of yeast can grow in the presence of a drug, sometimes up to extremely high drug concentrations, such that they may be clinically relevant. Identifying and quantifying the incidence with which these subpopulations arise is an essential step in understanding how pathogenic yeast, such as Candida species (i.e., C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. auris, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and others) as well as Cryptococcus species, behave in response to antifungal therapeutics. Here we describe simple in vitro protocols for the quantification of drug responses with subpopulation resolution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3155-3_6 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!