Although the beneficial effect of biostimulation on reproduction has been reported, the influence of selectivity and social factors on the response to biostimulation has not received sufficient research attention in both Bos indicus and Bos indicus influenced cattle. Furthermore, 'green and cheap' strategies to improve cattle reproduction are currently in demand while Bos indicus influenced cattle with inferior reproductive performance, and farmers with economic limitations are common in tropical zones. Hence, to assess the reproductive response of crossbred taurus × indicus cows to biostimulation by pre-pubertal (PPM) or pubertal (PM) teasers males, two trials of 2 years each were conducted. Trial 1 n = 187 cows (Year 1:85 cows exposed to PPM and Year 2:102 cows exposed to PM). Trial 2 n = 196 cows (Year 1:101 cows exposed to PPM and Year 2:95 cows exposed to PM). The effect of exposing cows to PPM and PM on the intervals calving to first service (ICFS), calving to conception (ICC) and economic cost of days open (ECDO) was analysed using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and the effect of exposing cows to PPM and to PM on reproductive status at 90 days (RS90) and proportion of cows requiring hormonal protocols (PRH) was compared using χ analysis. Both ICFS and ICC were shorter (p < .0001) for PM-exposed females (96.12 ± 4.1 and 110.93 ± 2.9 days; respectively) compared with those PPM-exposed (134.41 ± 3.3 and 135.64 ± 2.4 days; respectively). With RS90, more (p < .0001) PM-exposed cows (50.7%) were pregnant compared with PPM-exposed cows (16.1%). The PRH was greater (p < .0001) in PPM-exposed cows (79.0%) compared with PM-exposed (27.9%). The ECDO was less (p < .0001) in PM-exposed cows (US$ 142.9 ± 3.8) compared with PPM-exposed (US$ 176.3 ± 2.9). In conclusion, cows exposed to PM had shorter ICFS and ICC compared with cows exposed to PPM. More cows exposed to PM were pregnant after 90 days, and PRH was less than cows exposed to PPM. Cows exposed to PM had a reduced ECDO than those exposed to PPM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.14356DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cows exposed
16
bos indicus
12
cows
11
reproductive response
8
response crossbred
8
cows biostimulation
8
biostimulation pre-pubertal
8
pubertal teasers
8
indicus influenced
8
influenced cattle
8

Similar Publications

Soil microbial communities are vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbances such as climate change and land management decisions, thus altering microbially-mediated ecosystem functions. Increasingly, multiple stressors are considered in investigations of ecological response to disturbances. Typically, these investigations involve concurrent stressors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bovine besnoitiosis, a disease caused by the tissue cyst-forming apicomplexan Besnoitia besnoiti, is re-emerging in Europe, leading to significant impairment of health and production, as well as economic losses. The early detection of the disease is of the utmost importance for the implementation of effective control measures, yet this is a challenge due to the lack of specific early clinical signs. The objectives of our study were 1) to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of three tests to detect B.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bovine besnoitiosis is a re-emerging cattle disease caused by the apicomplexan parasite , which severely affects individual animal welfare and profitability in cattle industry. We recently showed that tachyzoite exposure to bovine polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) effectively triggers neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, leading to parasite immobilization hampering host cell infection. So far, the triggers of this defense mechanism remain unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Seventy-two non-lactating, pregnant Angus cows (initial body weight (BW) = 637 ± 13 kg; body condition score (BCS) = 5.5 ± 0.07 yr; and age = 6.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Infections in Humans.

N Engl J Med

December 2024

From the Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (S.G., K.R., A.C., K.K., C.T.D., M.K.K., S. Ellington, A.M.M., A.B., J.R.B., M.B., M.A.J., M.R.-C., E.B., T.T.S., T.M.U., V.G.D., C.R., S.J.O.); California Department of Public Health, Richmond (E.L.M., S.Z., V.K., D.A.W.); the Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (S.Z., C.D.); Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver (C.D., A.K., M.O.); Mid-Michigan District Health Department, Stanton (J.M.); Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing (S. Eckel); Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City (J.G., G.T.); Benton-Franklin Health District, Kennewick, WA (S.K.); Washington State Department of Health, Tumwater (A.U.); and Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin (E.R.G., C.A.H.).

Background: Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses have caused widespread infections in dairy cows and poultry in the United States, with sporadic human cases. We describe characteristics of human A(H5N1) cases identified from March through October 2024 in the United States.

Methods: We analyzed data from persons with laboratory-confirmed A(H5N1) virus infection using a standardized case-report form linked to laboratory results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention influenza A/H5 subtyping kit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!