Fake review detection has the characteristics of huge stream data processing scale, unlimited data increment, dynamic change, and so on. However, the existing fake review detection methods mainly target limited and static review data. In addition, deceptive fake reviews have always been a difficult point in fake review detection due to their hidden and diverse characteristics. To solve the above problems, this article proposes a fake review detection model based on sentiment intensity and PU learning (SIPUL), which can continuously learn the prediction model from the constantly arriving streaming data. First, when the streaming data arrive, the sentiment intensity is introduced to divide the reviews into different subsets (i.e., strong sentiment set and weak sentiment set). Then, the initial positive and negative samples are extracted from the subset using the marking mechanism of selection completely at random (SCAR) and Spy technology. Second, building a semi-supervised positive-unlabeled (PU) learning detector based on the initial sample to detect fake reviews in the data stream iteratively. According to the detection results, the data of initial samples and the PU learning detector are continuously updated. Finally, the old data are continually deleted according to the historical record points, so that the training sample data are within a manageable size and prevent overfitting. Experimental results show that the model can effectively detect fake reviews, especially deceptive reviews.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3234427 | DOI Listing |
Front Psychol
December 2024
Department of Communication and Media, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
In the fast-paced, densely populated information landscape shaped by digitization, distinguishing information from misinformation is critical. Fact-checkers are effective in fighting fake news but face challenges such as cognitive overload and time pressure, which increase susceptibility to cognitive biases. Establishing standards to mitigate these biases can improve the quality of fact-checks, bolster audience trust, and protect against reputation attacks from disinformation actors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Health Serv Res
December 2024
Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tabnak Ave., Daneshjou Blvd., Velenjak, P.O. Box 19835-35511, Tehran, I.R, Iran.
Background: Toward delivering appropriately safe, high quality and effective health care, healthcare organization should be health literate. This paper presents the development and psychometrics of an instrument for assessing the attributes of a health literate hospital which is called MAHLO-76 (Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization) here by authors.
Methods: The current study is methodological research which is involved two phases of tool development and psychometric evaluation.
Front Public Health
December 2024
CIEC, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Introduction: The pandemic caused by COVID-19 has accentuated the debate on the need for vaccination and called into question the need to increasingly bring this topic, which is widely disseminated in the scientific world, to school classes at all schooling phases. In this scenario, science education plays a key role in disseminating knowledge about the importance of vaccination and the impacting factors of a lack of immunization. In order to better understand this movement, it is necessary to understand the representations of individuals as a way of broadening paths to change this scenario.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Med Res Opin
December 2024
Bioethics Program, FLACSO Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
PeerJ Comput Sci
September 2024
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Department, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
While customer reviews are crucial for businesses to maintain their standing in the marketplace, some may employ humans to create favorable reviews for their benefit. However, advances in artificial intelligence have made it less complex to create these reviews, which now rival real ones written by humans. This poses a significant challenge in distinguishing between genuine and artificially generated reviews, thereby impacting consumer trust and decision-making processes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!