AI Article Synopsis
- Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are a significant issue for physiotherapists, with no prior meta-analysis on their prevalence among this group.
- The study aimed to determine the global prevalence of MSD in various body parts by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines.
- Findings indicated that lower back, thumb, neck, and shoulder are the most affected areas, with overall prevalence rates of 40.1% for lower back and 35.4% for thumbs, underscoring the need for prioritization in monitoring these risks.
Article Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are one of the most important problems among physiotherapists worldwide. However, there is no meta-analysis of the MSD prevalence in all body areas among physiotherapists.
Objectives: The purpose was to investigate and estimate the worldwide prevalence of MSD among physiotherapists using a systematic review-, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Methods: The systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed in 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines.
Data Sources: The search was performed on PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Medeley and Science.gov databases.
Study Appraisal: The quality appraisal of the included articles was assessed using the critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies AXIS.
Results: A total of 722 articles were found. After screening and comparison with the inclusion criteria, 26 studies were retained. Based on the random-effects model, the worldwide MSD prevalence in neck, upper back, mid back, lower back, shoulders, elbows, wrists/hands, thumb, hips/thighs, knees/legs, and ankles/feet was 26.4% (CI 95%: 21.0-31.9%), 17.7% (CI 95%: 13.2-22.2%), 14.9% (CI 95%: 7.7-22.1%), 40.1% (CI 95%: 32.2-48.0%), 20.8% (CI 95%: 16.5-25.1), 7.0% (CI 95%: 5.2-8.9), 18.1% (CI 95%: 14.7-21.5%), 35.4% (CI 95%: 23.0-47.8), 7.0% (CI 95%: 5.2-8.8), 13.0% (CI 95%: 10.3-15.8), and 5% (CI 95%: 4.0-6.9) respectively. The neck and shoulder prevalence of four continents were close to the world prevalence. No effect of continent was found on MSD prevalence. The heterogeneity of the results obtained in the meta-analysis and meta-regression was discussed.
Conclusions: Based on the random effects model, the results of the worldwide meta-analysis showed that lower back pain, thumb, neck and shoulder were the area most at risk for MSD and were therefore those to be monitored as a priority. Recommendations were proposed for future reviews and meta-analyses.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071744 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06345-6 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!