AI Article Synopsis

  • Only 72% of hospitals fully reported spinal fusions on their price estimator, and just 39% complied with all mandatory pricing disclosures, highlighting significant gaps in price transparency.
  • The average cash price for noncervical spinal fusions was $96,979, significantly higher than for cervical fusions at $62,595, indicating variability in costs among hospitals.
  • Factors like geographic practice costs, median income, and poverty rates showed weak correlations with pricing, suggesting that broader economic factors may influence hospital-negotiated rates.

Article Abstract

Introduction: To improve price transparency, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires hospitals to post accessible pricing data for common elective procedures along with all third-party-negotiated rates. We aimed to evaluate hospital compliance with CMS regulations for both price estimators and machine-readable files for spinal fusions and to evaluate factors contributing to variability in hospital-negotiated pricing.

Methods: We reviewed the top 100 orthopaedic hospitals ranked by US News & World Report to assess compliance with CMS price transparency regulations for all spine diagnosis-related groups. We recorded gross inpatient charge, cash price, and deidentified maximum and minimum rates for the 11 spine diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). Variability was compared with geographic practice costs (GPCI), expected Medicare reimbursements, and poverty rate and median income ratio.

Results: Only 72% of hospitals were fully compliant in reporting spinal fusions on their price estimator, and 39% were fully compliant in reporting all mandatory rates for spinal fusions. The overall estimated cash price was $96,979 ± $56,262 and $62,595 ± $40,307 for noncervical and cervical fusion, respectively. Cash prices at top 50 hospitals were higher for both noncervical and cervical fusions ( P = 0.0461 and P = 0.0341, respectively). The average minimum negotiated rates ranged from 0.88 to 1.15 times the expected Medicare reimbursement, while maximum and cash prices were 3.41 to 3.90 and 2.53 to 4.08 times greater than Medicare reimbursement. GPCI demonstrated little to no correlation with DRG pricing. However, minimum negotiated rates and cash prices demonstrated weak positive correlations with the median income ratio and weak negative correlations with the poverty rate.

Discussion: Most US hospitals are not fully compliant with CMS price transparency regulations for spinal fusions despite increased overall utilization of price estimators and machine-readable files. Although higher ranked hospitals charged more for spinal fusions, DRG prices remain widely variable with little to no correlation with practice cost or socioeconomic parameters.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00053DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal fusions
20
price transparency
16
transparency regulations
12
negotiated rates
12
fully compliant
12
cash prices
12
price
9
hospital compliance
8
rates spinal
8
compliance cms
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!