Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare performance 5 h after a 90-min endurance training session when either carbohydrate only or carbohydrate with added whey hydrolysate or whey isolate was ingested during the first 2 h of the recovery period.
Methods: Thirteen highly trained competitive male cyclists completed three exercise and diet interventions (double-blinded, randomized, crossover design) separated by 1 week. The 90-min morning session (EX1) included a 60 min time-trial (TT ). Immediately and 1 h after exercise, participants ingested either (1) 1.2 g carbohydrate∙kg ∙h (CHO), (2) 0.8 g carbohydrate∙kg ∙h + 0.4 g isolate whey protein∙kg ∙h (ISO) or (3) 0.8 g carbohydrate∙kg ∙h + 0.4 g hydrolysate whey protein∙kg ∙h (HYD). Additional intakes were identical between interventions. After 5 h of recovery, participants completed a time-trial performance (TT ) during which a specific amount of work was performed. Blood and urine were collected throughout the day.
Results: TT did not differ significantly between dietary interventions (CHO: 43:54 ± 1:36, ISO: 46:55 ± 2:32, HYD: 44:31 ± 2:01 min). Nitrogen balance during CHO was lower than ISO (p < 0.0001) and HYD (p < 0.0001), with no difference between ISO and HYD (p = 0.317). In recovery, the area under the curve for blood glucose was higher in CHO compared to ISO and HYD. HR, VO , RER, glucose, and lactate during EX2 were similar between interventions.
Conclusion: Performance did not differ after 5 h of recovery whether carbohydrate only or isocaloric carbohydrate plus protein was ingested during the first 2 h. Correspondingly, participants were not in negative nitrogen balance in any dietary intervention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.14364 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!