Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The ability of the Reciproc system (R40) followed by continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) to remove filling material from oval root canals of mandibular premolars filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus or Bio-C Sealer was evaluated by microtomography (micro-CT).
Material And Methods: The straight and oval root canals of 42 mandibular premolars were prepared with the ProDesign R 35.05 reciprocal file and randomly divided into two groups according to the material used to fill the canals (n=21): Group AH - Master Cone and AH Plus; Group BC - Master Cone and Bio-C Sealer. After filling and provisional sealing, the teeth were stored at 100% relative humidity and a temperature of 37°C for 30 days. The filling material was then removed with an R40 file. The material was considered completely removed when the R40 file reached the working length (WL), and no remaining filling material was visible on the canal walls. CUI was then performed. The teeth were scanned by micro- CT before and after removal of the filling material. The remaining filling material was measured in mm in the last apical 5 mm. The data were analyzed with the nonparametric Friedman test and subsequently with the Dunn test. The Mann-Whitney U test was also performed. Statistical significance was accepted at the 5% level.
Results: After instrumentation with the Reciproc R40, the volume of residual filling material was significantly greater in the BC group than in the AH group ( = 0.035). After CUI, there was no difference in the volume of residual material between the two groups ( = 0.705).
Conclusions: Bio-C sealer was more difficult to remove with the Reciproc file than AH Plus. CUI improved the removal of residual filling material regardless of sealer type. However, no technique was able to completely clear the canals of filling material. Bioceramic cement, CUI, micro-CT, reciproc, retreatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062467 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60013 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!