AI Article Synopsis

  • Pathogenic strains in swine lead to significant economic losses, particularly in Japan where antimicrobial use is higher compared to other farm animals.
  • A recent study analyzed 1,708 strains from diseased swine over nearly three decades (1991-2019) and identified increasing multidrug-resistant strains, including resistant serogroups O116 and OSB9.
  • The study found that although third-generation cephalosporins had a low resistance rate, alternative antimicrobials like apramycin and bicozamycin were more effective against highly multidrug-resistant strains.

Article Abstract

Pathogenic strains are important causes of several swine diseases that result in significant economic losses worldwide. In Japan, the use of antimicrobials in swine is much higher than that in other farm animals every year. Antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic strains also heavily impacts the swine industry due to the limited treatment options and an increase in the potential risk of the One Health crisis. In 2016, we investigated 684 Japanese isolates of swine pathogenic belonging to four major serogroups and reported the emergence and increase in the highly multidrug-resistant serogroups O116 and OSB9 and the appearance of colistin-resistant strains. In the present study, by expanding our previous analysis, we determined the serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of 1,708 strains isolated from diseased swine between 1991 and 2019 in Japan and found recent increases in the prevalences of multidrug-resistant strains and minor serogroup strains. Among the antimicrobials examined in this study that have been approved for animal use, a third-generation cephalosporin was found to be effective against the most isolates (resistance rate: 1.2%) but not against highly multidrug-resistant strains. We also analyzed the susceptibilities of the 1,708 isolates to apramycin and bicozamycin, both which are available for treating swine in Japan, and found that the rates of resistance to apramycin and bicozamycin were low (6.7% and 5.8%, respectively), and both antimicrobials are more effective (resistance rates: 2.7% and 5.4%, respectively) than third-generation cephalosporins (resistance rate: 16.2%) against highly multidrug-resistant strains.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065406PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1107566DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antimicrobial resistance
12
pathogenic strains
12
highly multidrug-resistant
12
multidrug-resistant strains
12
strains
9
resistance pathogenic
8
strains isolated
8
isolated diseased
8
diseased swine
8
resistance rate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!