AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates the effectiveness of the monoclonal antibody lokivetmab (LKV) in treating pruritus (itching) in dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD), finding that while LKV works well for most dogs, it doesn't fully address acute allergic skin inflammation.
  • - Researchers compared cytokine production in house dust mite-sensitized dogs treated with LKV versus untreated dogs, revealing no significant differences in cytokine levels or skin lesion severity.
  • - The results indicate that inhibiting IL-31 with LKV doesn't significantly reduce the expression of other inflammatory mediators, suggesting the need for exploring additional treatment options for acute AD.

Article Abstract

Background: The caninised monoclonal antibody lokivetmab (LKV), directed at interleukin (IL)-31, is very effective at controlling pruritus in most dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD). However, evidence exists that IL-31 is not required for the induction of acute allergic skin inflammation, which might explain why this treatment is less efficacious in some dogs with AD.

Hypothesis/objectives: To compare the comprehensive transcriptome analysis of house dust mite (HDM)-sensitised dogs with and without treatment with LKV to attest our hypothesis that LKV does not majorly affect acute cytokine/chemokine production.

Animals: Six HDM-sensitised atopic Maltese-beagle dogs.

Materials And Methods: In this cross-over study, the cytokine profiling of acute AD skin lesions was compared by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), with or without LKV-induced inhibition of IL-31. Skin biopsies were obtained from each dog at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h after epicutaneous HDM allergen provocation.

Results: Macroscopic and microscopic skin lesion scores were not significantly different between the LKV- and nontreatment groups at any time points. Likewise, the results of RNA-Seq analysis revealed no significant difference in the messenger (m)RNA expression of the major cytokines between these two groups. In LKV-treated dogs, IL6, IL9, IL13, IL33, CCL17, and CCL22 were significantly upregulated compared to their baseline expression levels, suggesting that these cytokines are unaffected by IL-31 inhibition.

Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: IL-31 inhibition is insufficient to prevent the expression of other proinflammatory mediators in acute AD and these could be considered as other potential therapeutic targets.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vde.13159DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

profiling acute
8
atopic dermatitis
8
skin lesions
8
il-31 inhibition
8
il-31
6
acute
5
skin
5
cytokine transcriptome
4
transcriptome profiling
4
acute experimental
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!