Assemble it like this! - Is AR- or VR-based training an effective alternative to video-based training in manual assembly?

Appl Ergon

Work and Engineering Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstr. 17-19, 52066, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address:

Published: July 2023

AR- and VR-based training is increasingly being used in the industry to train workers safely and effectively for new tasks. In this study, we investigated and compared the effects of AR-, VR- and video-based training on short- and long-term objective performance measures and subjective evaluations in a manual assembly task. Our results showed that there was no difference between AR-, VR- and video-based training concerning the objective performance measures task completion time and error count. However, in the subjective evaluations VR-based training showed a significantly higher perceived task load and a lower usability rating than the AR- and video-based training regimes. An exploratory analysis additionally revealed partially better results for AR than for VR after adjusting the data for the age of the participants. Future research should further investigate the advantage of AR- and video-based methods over VR when the age and technology experience of participants are taken into account.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

video-based training
16
vr-based training
12
ar- vr-based
8
ar- vr-
8
vr- video-based
8
objective performance
8
performance measures
8
subjective evaluations
8
ar- video-based
8
training
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!