Cultural and regulatory factors influence distribution and trajectory of invasive species in the United States: A wild pig case study.

J Environ Manage

Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture, College of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, a213 Thompson Hall, MS, 39762, USA; Quantitative Ecology & Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture, College of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, a213 Thompson Hall, MS, 39762, USA.

Published: July 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Since 2012, managing invasive wild pigs has become a major focus in the US due to their significant economic impact, estimated at $1.5 billion annually, and their negative effects on agriculture, ecology, and native wildlife.
  • Different states have inconsistent policies and regulations regarding wild pig control, influenced by varying resources and stakeholder interests, impacting the presence and spread of these populations.
  • The study suggests that hunting opportunities are linked to the presence and expansion of wild pig populations, and recommends standardized, stricter transportation regulations to prevent further introduction and spread of wild pigs in states not yet affected.

Article Abstract

Since 2012, control of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States (US) has become a state and national priority due to their propensity to damage agricultural commodities and infrastructure, transmit disease, detrimentally affect ecological processes, and compete with native wildlife for resources. While several life-history characteristics certainly aided their proliferation, the recreational value of wild pigs was likely the stimulus for translocation and subsequent establishment of populations in ≥35 states, causing an annual economic burden of $1.5 billion in the US. Consequently, state-level legislative procedures regarding wild pigs are expanding in scope and priority, but policy among states lacks uniformity. States vary in their treatment of wild pig control based on differing resource appropriations and stakeholder interests. We conducted an evaluation to determine if policy was associated with state-level 1) presence of wild pigs, 2) spatial extent of wild pig population occupancy, and 3) trajectory of wild pig population occupancy. Our results suggest the presence of wild pigs in various states was influenced by hunting preserves and the sale of hunting opportunities. In occupied states, the spatial extent of wild pigs was again associated with the sale of hunting opportunities and a wild pig hunting culture. Finally, the trajectory of state-level wild pig spatial occupancy was positively influenced by the sale of hunting opportunities, and negatively influenced by transportation policies. Based on these findings, we propose state governments standardize transportation policy and fenced hunting regulations across regions of the US in a more prohibitive fashion to diminish range expansion through illegal and negligent introductions via transportation, release, and escapes from game farms. Moreover, in states where wild pigs have yet to establish, we strongly recommend states proactively prohibit transportation through intra- and interstate movement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117742DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wild pigs
28
wild pig
24
wild
13
sale hunting
12
hunting opportunities
12
states
9
united states
8
states wild
8
presence wild
8
spatial extent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!