AI Article Synopsis

  • PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy is effective for advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but results vary among patients, prompting a study to use salivary glands as a reference for better patient stratification.
  • The researchers calculated a tumor-to-salivary gland ratio (PSG score) from PET images of 237 men, categorizing them into high, intermediate, and low groups based on quantitative and visual assessments.
  • The findings revealed that higher PSG scores correlated with better treatment outcomes, including a greater percentage of patients achieving over 50% prostate-specific antigen decline and longer PSA progression-free survival.

Article Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy can improve the outcome of patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but patients do not respond uniformly. We hypothesized that using the salivary glands as a reference organ can enable selective patient stratification. We aimed to establish a PSMA PET tumor-to-salivary gland ratio (PSG score) to predict outcomes after [Lu]PSMA. In total, 237 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with [Lu]PSMA were included. A quantitative PSG (qPSG) score (SUV ratio of whole-body tumor to parotid glands) was semiautomatically calculated on baseline [Ga]PSMA-11 PET images. Patients were divided into 3 groups: high (qPSG > 1.5), intermediate (qPSG = 0.5-1.5), and low (qPSG < 0.5) scores. Ten readers interpreted the 3-dimensional maximum-intensity-projection baseline [Ga]PSMA-11 PET images and classified patients into 3 groups based on visual PSG (vPSG) score: high (most of the lesions showed higher uptake than the parotid glands) intermediate (neither low nor high), and low (most of the lesions showed lower uptake than the parotid glands). Outcome data included a more than 50% prostate-specific antigen decline, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Of the 237 patients, the numbers in the high, intermediate, and low groups were 56 (23.6%), 163 (68.8%), and 18 (7.6%), respectively, for qPSG score and 106 (44.7%), 96 (40.5%), and 35 (14.8%), respectively, for vPSG score. The interreader reproducibility of the vPSG score was substantial (Fleiss weighted κ, 0.68). The more than 50% prostate-specific antigen decline was better in patients with a higher PSG score (high vs. intermediate vs. low, 69.6% vs. 38.7% vs. 16.7%, respectively, for qPSG [ < 0.001] and 63.2% vs 33.3% vs 16.1%, respectively, for vPSG [ < 0.001]). The median PSA progression-free survival of the high, intermediate, and low groups by qPSG score was 7.2, 4.0, and 1.9 mo ( < 0.001), respectively, by qPSG score and 6.7, 3.8, and 1.9 mo ( < 0.001), respectively, by vPSG score. The median OS of the high, intermediate, and low groups was 15.0, 11.2, and 13.9 mo ( = 0.017), respectively, by qPSG score and 14.3, 9.6, and 12.9 mo ( = 0.018), respectively, by vPSG score. The PSG score was prognostic for PSA response and OS after [Lu]PSMA. The visual PSG score assessed on 3-dimensional maximum-intensity-projection PET images yielded substantial reproducibility and comparable prognostic value to the quantitative score.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265242DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qpsg score
20
vpsg score
20
intermediate low
20
psg score
16
high intermediate
16
score
15
parotid glands
12
pet images
12
prostate-specific antigen
12
low groups
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!