Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the orthodontist's perspective of the strengths and weaknesses of their current multidisciplinary team (MDT) design for orthognathic treatment.
Participants And Methods: This was a qualitative study using online interviews of orthodontic consultants across England. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. This was the second part of a two-part study, where the first part, an online questionnaire survey, identified the variation in design of orthognathic MDTs across England and was the source of the 19 participants for this study.
Results: Seven themes were identified that influenced the design of orthognathic MDTs across England. Close working relationship with the team, access to closed surgery space to conduct the MDT and access to 3D planning were identified as definite strengths of some MDT clinics. Lack of a team psychologist and long waiting lists were identified as weaknesses of some orthognathic MDTs. Teaching and training within MDT clinics were highlighted as a strength of MDTs where surgery spaces were not restricted due to the pandemic. Finally, there was general agreement about revising the orthognathic minimum dataset for records collection as it was not thought to be in the patient's best interest.
Conclusion: This study was able to identify key areas considered to be determinants of a successful orthognathic MDT design from the orthodontic consultant's perspective. Orthodontic consultants across England prioritised the need for a psychologist in the orthognathic MDT to improve the effectiveness of these clinics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469473 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14653125231165069 | DOI Listing |
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Head and Neck Institute, University Hospital Center of Nice, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France; Nice Côte d'Azur Clinical Research Unit (UR2CA), France. Electronic address:
There has been a recent increase in the global demand for jawline augmentation. Managing angle definition in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery remains challenging owing to the characteristics of classic mandibular osteotomy, which mostly allows sagittal mandibular movements but cannot modify the ramus height. The advent of computer-assisted surgical planning and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing techniques for patient-specific implant fabrication has introduced new methods for jawline management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Seattle Children's Hospital, Craniofacial Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Objective: To investigate whether differences in early cleft care increase risk of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after maxillary advancement.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Large pediatric tertiary care hospital.
J Clin Med
January 2025
PhD Program and Center of Morphological and Surgical Research (CEMyQ), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.
: This study aims to describe and analyze the indications and clinical results of total TMJ replacement in participants with degenerative and/or inflammatory joint diseases, defining patient and intervention conditions. : A systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and reported according to the PRISMA Items update. The search strategy was from 1997 to July 2024 in Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Graduate School, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Objective: This study evaluated the degree of paresthesia and recovery of the lower lip and chin in patients who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) by measuring the preoperative and postoperative trigeminal somatosensory evoked potential (TSEP).
Study Design: Thirty-seven patients with skeletal class II and III malocclusion who underwent SSRO were included. TSEP was measured at 7 points: preoperatively and 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Objective: To investigate and compare the morphology of the sphenoid sinus (SS) in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and the control group.
Design: A retrospective comparative study.
Setting: Craniofacial rehabilitation institution.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!