Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
BACKGROUND Studies have revealed that having systemic inflammation is linked to worse survival rates across a range of malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in combination with fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) in surgical patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC). MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2010 to December 2016, 200 patients with CRC had their preoperative NLR, PLR, LMR, and FAR assessed. Following that, univariate and multivariate analytic techniques were used to establish the prognostic value of these 4 indicators. Plotting the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves allowed researchers to assess whether the NLR-FAR, PLR-FAR, and LMR-FAR could be applied to predict survival. RESULTS High preoperative NLR (≥3.9 vs <3.9, P<0.001), high preoperative PLR (≥106 vs <106, P=0.039), low preoperative LMR (≥4.2 vs <4.2, P<0.001), and high preoperative FAR (≥0.09 vs <0.09, P=0.028) were significantly associated with worse overall survival in multivariate analysis, which was also confirmed with survival curves. The prediction outcomes of the combined components outperformed those of a single index. NLR-FAR outperformed PLR-FAR and LMR-FAR as a predictor of CRC, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 97.24% (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.9535 to 0.9915, P<0.0001), 92.57% (95% CI=0.8880 to 0.9634, P<0.0001), and 90.26% (95% CI=0.8515 to 0.9538, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with CRC, preoperative NLR, PLR, LMR, and FAR can be utilized as independent predictors of overall survival. Additionally, in the combined detection findings, NLR and FAR performed better as predictors of CRC patients than PLR-FAR and LMR-FAR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084709 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939442 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!