Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) technology has been validated to assess thermal burn depth by predicting wound healing potential. However, there is no clear evidence for its use in chemical burns. We present a case of an 8% total burn surface area (TBSA) nitric acid burn following an industrial accident, in an otherwise healthy 36-year-old man. LDI assessment was suggestive of poor healing potential of >21 days, warranting surgical management. However, conservative management was opted for based on clinical assessment as the wound eschar appeared thin and more consistent with epithelial staining. Patient follow-up confirmed a total burn healing time of two months, suggesting that the LDI assessment was accurate. A comprehensive literature review was performed using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database to identify animal or clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of LDI in chemical burns. A qualitative synthesis of our findings is presented. We identified two experimental studies in porcine models with sulfur mustard burns, each confirming the accuracy of LDI assessment when compared to the histopathology findings. Limited experimental animal studies on the use of LDI suggest similar validity in chemical burns, and this correlates with the clinical outcome in this case. However, this alone is insufficient to prove its validity and define its role in the assessment of chemical burns. Clinical trials are required to further assess and define the parameters of LDI use and efficacy in this context.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628518 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irad044 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!