A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Outflow Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplant: Middle Hepatic Vein Reconstruction Versus Separate Tributaries to Inferior Vena Cava Anastomosis. | LitMetric

Objectives: In right lobe living donor liver transplant, proper reconstruction of the segment 5 vein and segment 8 vein is essential. Herein, we compared 2 different techniques for segment 5 vein reconstruction.

Materials And Methods: This prospective nonrandomized study included all recipients of modified right lobe living donor liver transplant who had reconstruction of the segment 5 vein, with or without segment 8 veins, from October 2018 to October 2021. Patients were grouped into group A (classical technique) and group B (modified technique). For group A, the segment 5 (and segment 8, if present) vein was anastomosed in an end-to-side fashion to a polytetrafluoroethylene synthetic graft positioned parallel to the cut surface of the liver graft; then, during implant, its proximal end was anastomosed to recipient's middle hepatic or middle-left hepatic veins unified orifice. In group B (modified technique), the stumps of segment 5 (and segment 8 if present) were anastomosed in an end-to-end fashion to 2 different polytetrafluoroethylene grafts; then during implant, the other ends of the segment 5 grafts were anastomosed directly to the inferior vena cava. Postoperative segment 5 vein patency and graft recovery were compared.

Results: Forty patients were included: 22 in group A and 18 group B. There were no significant differences in the demographic data or characteristics of donors, grafts, and recipients between the groups. There was better patency in segment 5 synthetic grafts in group A at all time points compared with group B, but this difference was statistically significant only at 1 month (18 [81.8%] vs 9 [50%, respectively; P = .046).There was no statistically significant difference in the markers of graft recovery in both groups.

Conclusions: Reconstruction of the segment 5 vein by polytetrafluoroethylene synthetic graft in a fashion to resemble the native middle hepatic vein in modified right lobe living donor liver transplant has better patency than anastomosis of the segment 5 vein in an end-to-end fashion to the synthetic graft and then to the inferior vena cava. Both techniques did not affect graft recovery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6002/ect.2022.0417DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

segment vein
32
lobe living
16
living donor
16
donor liver
16
liver transplant
16
segment
14
middle hepatic
12
inferior vena
12
vena cava
12
reconstruction segment
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!