Background: Before integrating new machine learning (ML) into clinical practice, algorithms must undergo validation. Validation studies require sample size estimates. Unlike hypothesis testing studies seeking a -value, the goal of validating predictive models is obtaining estimates of model performance. There is no standard tool for determining sample size estimates for clinical validation studies for machine learning models.

Methods: Our open-source method, Sample Size Analysis for Machine Learning (SSAML) was described and was tested in three previously published models: brain age to predict mortality (Cox Proportional Hazard), COVID hospitalization risk prediction (ordinal regression), and seizure risk forecasting (deep learning).

Results: Minimum sample sizes were obtained in each dataset using standardized criteria.

Discussion: SSAML provides a formal expectation of precision and accuracy at a desired confidence level. SSAML is open-source and agnostic to data type and ML model. It can be used for clinical validation studies of ML models.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045793PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030685DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sample size
16
machine learning
16
validation studies
16
clinical validation
12
size analysis
8
analysis machine
8
learning clinical
8
size estimates
8
sample
5
validation
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!