Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: This study compared the biomechanical properties of orthogonal plating with plate-nail and parallel plating constructs for supracondylar distal femur fractures.
Methods: A supracondylar distal femur fracture was simulated using 15 synthetic osteoporotic femurs. Constructs included: (1) plate-nail (lateral locked distal femoral plate + retrograde intramedullary nail); (2) parallel plating (lateral locked distal femoral plate + medial 4.0 mm compression plate); and (3) orthogonal plating (lateral locked distal femoral plate + posterior one-third tubular plate). Specimens underwent nondestructive loading, fatigue loading, and loading to failure. Gapping at the fracture was measured using a three-dimensional motion capture system. Baseline torsional and axial stiffness, stiffness and strain after fatigue loading, and load to failure were determined. A case example of orthogonal plating is also presented.
Results: There was no difference in baseline torsional (p = 0.51) and axial stiffness (p = 0.53). Stiffness after fatigue loading was highest with parallel plating, with no difference between the plate-nail and orthogonal plating constructs (p = 0.84). Strain after fatigue loading was lowest in the parallel plating group (0.54 ± 0.19%), followed by the plate-nail (2.89 ± 0.83%) and orthogonal plating groups (3.04 ± 0.51%).
Conclusion: Orthogonal plating demonstrated comparable baseline stiffness to plate-nail and parallel plating constructs, and similar biomechanical performance in fatigue loading to plate-nail constructs. All specimens had ≤3% strain after fatigue loading, suggesting sufficient stability for fracture healing. The benefits of enhanced stability from dual-implant fixation may be achieved through orthogonal plating while avoiding an additional medial surgical approach, and therefore warrants further investigation as a novel alternative for distal femur fracture fixation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039308 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.003 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!