AI Article Synopsis

  • The survey investigates the use of magnetic resonance contrast agents (MRCA) in online MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT), aimed at improving treatment visualization and workflow in clinical settings.
  • Conducted in September 2021, the study included a 16-question questionnaire sent to hospitals worldwide with MR Linacs, achieving an 82.7% response rate from 43 out of 52 centers.
  • Results showed that over half of the centers utilize MRCA, with Gadoxetate as the most common agent and liver applications being prevalent, indicating a call for international guidelines due to varying practices and potential pitfalls in clinical usage.

Article Abstract

Aims: The introduction of on-line magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) has led to an improvement in the therapeutic workflow of radiotherapy treatments thanks to the better visualization of therapy volumes assured by the higher soft tissue contrast. Magnetic Resonance contrast agents (MRCA) could improve the target delineation in on-line MRIgRT planning as well as reduce inter-observer variability and enable innovative treatment optimization protocols. The aim of this survey is to investigate the utilization of MRCA among centres that clinically implemented on-line MRIgRT technology.

Methods: In September 2021, we conducted an online survey consisting of a sixteen-question questionnaire that was distributed to the all the hospitals around the world equipped with MR Linacs. The questionnaire was developed by two Italian 0.35 T and 1.5 T MR-Linac centres and was validated by four other collaborating centres, using a Delphi consensus methodology.

Results: The survey was distributed to 52 centres and 43 centres completed it (82.7%). Among these centres, 23 institutions (53.5%) used the 0.35T MR-Linac system, while the remaining 20 (46.5%) used the 1.5T MR-Linac system.According to results obtained, 25 (58%) of the centres implemented the use of MRCA for on-line MRIgRT. Gadoxetate (Eovist®; Primovist®) was reported to be the most used MRCA (80%) and liver the most common site of application (58%). Over 70% of responders agreed/strongly agreed to the need for international guidelines.

Conclusions: The use of MRCA in clinical practice presents several pitfalls and future research will be necessary to understand the actual advantage derived from the use of MRCA in clinical practice, their toxicity profiles and better define the need of formulating guidelines for standardising the use of MRCA in MRIgRT workflow.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034422PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100615DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical practice
12
on-line mrigrt
12
contrast agents
8
magnetic resonance
8
mrca clinical
8
mrca
7
centres
7
mrigrt
5
current practices
4
practices perspectives
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!