A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of in vitro fosfomycin susceptibility testing methods with agar dilution for carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichiacoli. | LitMetric

Purpose: The emergence of Extensively drug resistant (XDR) pathogens like Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR Kpn) and Carbapenem Resistant Escherichia coli (CR Eco) has limited therapeutic options for treating them. Fosfomycin a broad-spectrum antibiotic, has emerged as a potential treatment option in combination with other agents. It is therefore important that accurate drug susceptibility testing (DST) results of fosfomycin should be available to all clinical microbiology laboratories. Agar dilution which is the recommended method for fosfomycin DST is not convenient to adopt in a routine set-up. This study aimed to determine the susceptibility pattern of CR Kpn and CR Eco to fosfomycin and to evaluate the discrepancies of the available manual MIC based alternative methods.

Methods: Agar dilution (AD), broth microdilution (BMD), E-test and Ezy MIC test were performed on 235 CR-Kpn and Eco isolates respectively.

Results: Of 177 CR Kpn, 31.63% (n ​= ​56/177) of the isolates were susceptible by AD. Categorical Agreement (CA) by BMD, E-test and Ezy MIC were lower than the acceptable limit while Very Major Errors (VMEs) and Major Errors (MEs) were beyond the acceptable limits. In the case of CR Eco, 96.55% (n ​= ​56/58) were susceptible by AD. CA of 100% (n ​= ​58/58) was shown by both BMD and Ezy MIC while 86.20% (n ​= ​50/58) was shown by E-test, with no VME observed for CR Eco. ME was only observed for E-test method.

Conclusion: The alternative methods were in poor agreement with AD method for CR Kpn and for CR Eco, BMD and Ezy MIC have shown reliable results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2023.01.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ezy mic
16
agar dilution
12
carbapenem resistant
12
susceptibility testing
8
resistant klebsiella
8
klebsiella pneumoniae
8
kpn eco
8
bmd e-test
8
e-test ezy
8
major errors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!