Purpose: To characterize focal biomechanical differences between normal, keratoconic, and post-laser vision correction (LVC) corneas using motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Methods: Thirty eyes from 30 patients (10 normal controls [Controls], 10 post-LVC, and 10 stage I or II keratoconus [KC]) had Scheimpflug and motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy imaging using a custom-built device. Mean, maximum (max) and minimum (min) Brillouin shift, spatial standard deviation, and max-min values were compared. Min values were correlated with local Brillouin values at multiple Scheimpflug imaging locations.

Results: Mean (P < .0003), min (P < .00001), spatial standard deviation (P < .01), and max-min (P < .001) were significantly different between the groups. In post hoc pairwise comparisons, the best differentiators for group comparisons were mean (P = .0004) and min (P = .000002) for Controls vs KC, min (P = .0022) and max-min (P = .002) for Controls vs LVC, and mean (P = .0037) and min (P = .0043) for LVC vs KC. Min (area under the receiver operating characteristic = 1.0) and mean (area under the receiver operating characteristic =  0.96) performed well in differentiating Control and KC eyes. Min values correlated best with Brillouin shift values at the thinnest corneal point (r = 0.871, P = .001) and maximum keratometry value identified in the tangential curvature map (r = 0.840, P = .002).

Conclusions: Motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy effectively characterized focal corneal biomechanical alterations in LVC and KC and clearly differentiated these groups from Controls. Primary motion-tracking Brillouin metrics performed well in differentiating groups as compared with basic Scheimpflug metrics, in contrast to previous Brillouin studies, and identified focal changes after LVC where prior Brillouin studies did not.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11108093PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2023.03.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

motion-tracking brillouin
12
brillouin microscopy
8
normal keratoconic
8
keratoconic post-laser
8
post-laser vision
8
vision correction
8
microscopy evaluation
4
evaluation normal
4
correction corneas
4
corneas purpose
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: To characterize focal biomechanical alterations in subclinical keratoconus (SKC) using motion-tracking (MT) Brillouin microscopy and evaluate the ability of MT Brillouin metrics to differentiate eyes with SKC from normal control eyes.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Participants: Thirty eyes from 30 patients were evaluated, including 15 eyes from 15 bilaterally normal patients and 15 eyes with SKC from 15 patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To characterize focal biomechanical differences between normal, keratoconic, and post-laser vision correction (LVC) corneas using motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Methods: Thirty eyes from 30 patients (10 normal controls [Controls], 10 post-LVC, and 10 stage I or II keratoconus [KC]) had Scheimpflug and motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy imaging using a custom-built device.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy for in-vivo corneal biomechanics mapping.

Biomed Opt Express

December 2022

Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, 8278 Paint Branch Drive, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

Corneal biomechanics play a critical role in maintaining corneal shape and thereby directly influence visual acuity. However, direct corneal biomechanical measurement in-vivo with sufficient accuracy and a high spatial resolution remains an open need. Here, we developed a three-dimensional (3D) motion-tracking Brillouin microscope for in-vivo corneal biomechanics mapping.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!