Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
An approach to remove ammonia from mining wastewater is to precipitate ammonia into struvite, and flocculation was proved to enhance settling of struvite flocs. But the current literature fails to consider flocculent properties of struvite flocs, and previous studies focused only on small volumes. This study evaluates the effect of ammonia concentration and height on removal efficiency of struvite flocs in a batch system and compares removal efficiency of struvite flocs between a batch and a pilot-scale continuous settling process to evaluate the potential of using flocculation to recover struvite crystals as a stand-alone method. Removal efficiency of struvite using flocculation is evaluated depending on depth in a batch system for two different ammonia concentrations (45 and 90 ppm) and in a continuous system for different flowrates. It is shown that a higher concentration promotes flocculation and enhances settling velocities of struvite flocs. The difference between the batch and the continuous processes for the same removal efficiency was significantly higher from what has been reported in the literature: in the continuous process, 89% of struvite flocs have been recovered with a surface overflow rate (SOR) of 1.8 m.h , whereas, for the same height, the same efficiency corresponds to SOR = 9 m.h in the batch process. The fragile nature of struvite flocs is potentially responsible for such a difference. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Settling velocities of struvite flocs are highly dependant on concentration and depth. Removal efficiency are considerably higher with a batch settling process for the same surface overflow rate. Flocculation enable 89% of struvite fines to be recovered in a continuous settling process with a SOR of 1.8 m.hs .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wer.10853 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!