Background: Pharmacists have been included in general practice teams to provide non-dispensing services in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) since 2016. Interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness are key considerations in providing high-quality patient care. These concepts have not been well studied following the inclusion of a pharmacist in general practice teams.

Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted to explore collaboration between pharmacists and health professionals in eight general practices in the ACT, where pharmacists were included in their teams. A validated survey instrument was adapted and utilised to assess the changes in interprofessional collaboration over time following the addition of a pharmacist. Another validated survey was utilised to explore team effectiveness at the end of the study. Semi-structured interviews, with a thematic analysis, were conducted with a purposeful sample of general practice staff members to understand the factors influencing the development of interprofessional collaboration.

Results: In total, 56 and 41 participants completed the baseline and follow-up survey, including 26 who completed both surveys to assess the change in collaboration over time. Interprofessional collaboration scores were high initially and did not change over time. Team effectiveness was also high at the end of the study. Twenty-one individuals participated in interviews, which generated four main interrelated themes related to interprofessional collaboration: professional working relationships, trust, commitment to collaboration, and barriers to collaboration. Trust was integral to professional working relationships and commitment to collaboration. The barriers to collaboration included not having a role description for pharmacists, inadequate interest to initiate working relationships, lack of dedicated time for interaction, lack of utilisation, and poor awareness of pharmacist-led activities in general practice.

Conclusion: Interprofessional collaboration was initially high and not influenced by the addition of a pharmacist, perhaps reflecting the inherent nature of the general practices willing to include a pharmacist within their team. Introducing a clear job description for pharmacists, and dedicating time to interact with pharmacists, could be beneficial in improving trust and professional working relationships and enhancing collaboration between the pharmacists and other general practice team members.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031930PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00550-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interprofessional collaboration
24
general practice
20
working relationships
16
collaboration
12
team effectiveness
12
professional working
12
general
8
practice teams
8
pharmacists
8
pharmacists included
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe labor and delivery nurses' experiences in caring for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We used a descriptive phenomenological design and purposeful sampling to recruit experienced labor and delivery nurses for flexible semi-structured face-to-face audiotaped interviews. Constant comparison was used to analyze data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ministerial Decree (D.M.) 77/2022 aims to reform Italy's primary care system by establishing community health centres and integrating digital tools to address healthcare access disparities and workforce shortages.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How Nursing Home Professionals Frame the Perspective on Residents' Safety Management: A Q-Methodology Approach.

J Adv Nurs

December 2024

College of Nursing and L-HOPE Program for Community-Based Total Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Aim: To identify a frame of reference for resident safety management in nursing homes.

Design: Q-methodology.

Methods: This study was conducted using Q-methodology to identify shared perspectives about resident safety management among nursing home professionals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interprofessional Collaboration and Patient/Family Engagement on Rounds in a Comprehensive Stroke Center: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Qual Manag Health Care

December 2024

Author Affiliations: Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Xie); Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Dr Xie) and Neurology (Drs Bahouth, Salas, and Zink), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Nursing, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Drs Barany, Watson, Zink, and Hairston and Ms Shakes); Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing (Drs Tanner, Hanson, Hansen, McDonald, and Hairston), Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (Dr Abu-Rish Blakeney).

Background And Objectives: Daily rounds provide an opportunity for interprofessional collaboration and patient/family engagement, which are critical to stroke care. As part of a quality improvement program, we conducted a baseline assessment to examine interprofessional collaboration and patient/family engagement during the current rounding process in a 12-bed comprehensive stroke center. Findings from the baseline assessment will be used to inform the development, implementation, and evaluation of a new rounding model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This AOTA Position Statement describes how occupational therapy practitioners work as part of an interprofessional collaborative practice in various settings, including, but not limited to, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, school systems, and community agencies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!