Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background And Objective: The goal of this study was to assess macular vascular density evolution, macular thickness, and functional outcomes after intravitreal dexamethasone implants for diabetic macular edema.
Patients And Methods: Vascular density was evaluated with optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography in 21 eyes. Macular thickness was evaluated with structural OCT. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were evaluated before and after treatment, and these functional outcomes were analyzed for association with anatomic outcomes. Macular vessel density in the superficial capillary plexus was evaluated with OCT angiography and quantified in areas with no fluid, allowing a more accurate measurement and eliminating the segmentation bias in areas with intra-retinal fluid. Such a methodology was possible by positioning the scans only in areas with no fluid before and after the implant. The absence of fluid in these areas was confirmed by three experienced evaluators using both the B-scan and the en face. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were evaluated before and after treatment, and these functional outcomes were analyzed for association with anatomic outcomes.
Results: At 30, 60, and 90 days after implantation, there was improvement in macular perfusion in areas without fluid after intravitreal dexamethasone implantation, accompanied by reduced macular thickness and improved visual acuity ( < .001). However, there was no improvement in contrast sensitivity after treatment.
Conclusions: Improved macular perfusion after treatment with intravitreal dexamethasone implantation may be associated with modulation of leukostasis, when the release of cytokines leads to capillary endothelial damage and obstruction of the micro-vasculature, leading to impaired capillary perfusion and ischemic damage. Despite the anatomical and functional findings demonstrated, further studies are needed to prove the relationship between the inflammatory mechanisms of diabetic macular edema and its relationship with macular perfusion and functional aspects. .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20230221-02 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!