AI Article Synopsis

  • The UK's first multi-centre study is exploring whether using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions is just as effective as standard treatment for early-stage colorectal cancer patients without minimal residual disease (MRD).
  • The study involves recruiting patients with high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer, who will be randomly assigned to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy or standard chemotherapy to compare their 3-year disease-free survival rates.
  • The research aims to potentially spare patients from unnecessary chemotherapy, reduce toxicity, and save costs for the National Health Service (NHS), while targeting a total of 1621 participants across about 50 UK centers over four years.

Article Abstract

Background: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK's first multi-centre, prospective, randomised study to determine whether a de-escalation strategy using ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy, as measured by 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in patients with resected CRC with no evidence of MRD (ctDNA negative post-operatively). In doing so we may be able to spare patients unnecessary chemotherapy and associated toxicity and achieve significant cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS).

Methods: We are recruiting patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III CRC who are being considered for ACT into the study which uses results from a plasma-only ctDNA assay to guide treatment decisions. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 3 years between the trial arms. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients in the ctDNA-guided arm who are ctDNA negative post-operatively and receive de-escalated ACT compared to the standard arm, the difference in overall survival (OS), neurotoxicity and quality of life between the arms, and the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided therapy compared to SOC treatment. We hypothesise that using a ctDNA-guided approach to ACT decisions is non-inferior to SOC. Target accrual is 1621 patients over 4 years, which will provide a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.1 to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1.25 in survival of the ctDNA-guided approach compared to SOC. We anticipate approximately 50 UK centres will participate. The study opened with the Guardant Reveal plasma-only ctDNA assay in August 2022.

Discussion: The trial will determine whether ctDNA guided ACT is non-inferior to SOC ACT in patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with the potential to significantly reduce unnecessary ACT and the toxicity associated with it.

Trial Registration: NCT04050345.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026439PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adjuvant chemotherapy
12
high risk
12
risk stage
12
stage stage
12
stage iii
12
patients
10
ctdna
9
ctdna guided
8
chemotherapy versus
8
standard care
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!