Center-Level Variation in Hospitalization Costs of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Ann Thorac Surg

Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address:

Published: March 2024

Background: Using a nationally representative database, the present study evaluated the degree of center-level variation in the cost of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Methods: All adults undergoing elective, isolated TAVR were identified in the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with hospitalization costs. The random intercept for each hospital was generated and considered to be the baseline cost attributable to care at each center. Hospitals in the highest decile of baseline costs were classified as high-cost hospitals. The association of high-cost hospital status with in-hospital mortality and perioperative complications was subsequently assessed.

Results: An estimated 119,492 patients, with a mean age of 80 years and a 45.9% prevalence of female sex, met the study criteria. Analysis of random intercepts indicated that 54.3% of variability in costs was attributable to interhospital differences rather than patient factors. Perioperative respiratory failure, neurologic complications, and acute kidney injury were associated with increased episodic expenditure but did not explain the observed center-level variation. The baseline cost associated with each hospital ranged from -$26,000 to $162,000. Notably, high-cost hospital status was not linked to annual TAVR caseload or to odds of mortality (P = .83), acute kidney injury (P = .18), respiratory failure (P = .32), or neurologic complications (P = .55).

Conclusions: The present analysis identified significant variation in the cost of TAVR, which was largely attributable to center-level rather than patient factors. Hospital TAVR volume and occurrence of complications were not drivers of the observed variation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.03.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

center-level variation
12
hospitalization costs
8
transcatheter aortic
8
aortic valve
8
valve replacement
8
variation cost
8
baseline cost
8
high-cost hospital
8
hospital status
8
patient factors
8

Similar Publications

Background: A pediatric national heart review board (NHRB) and exception guidance document to standardize decision-making were implemented in 2021 to reduce variability and ensure equity in status exceptions for pediatric candidates. We evaluated the hypothesis that these changes decreased center variability and racial disparities within the granted exceptions.

Methods: Guidance document and pediatric NHRB were operational by February and June 2021, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Thromboembolism prophylaxis timing is associated with center mortality in traumatic brain injury: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program retrospective analysis.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

November 2024

From the Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB) (T.N.C., A.V., J.B., N.Y.C., P.B.), David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California; Department of Surgery (A.S., G.B.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; and Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery (P.B.), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.

Article Synopsis
  • The study examines the timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis (VTEPPx) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and finds notable variation in practices across hospitals.
  • Approximately 38.7% of patients were treated at centers with early VTEPPx, and those centers also showed better outcomes in terms of mortality rates.
  • The research highlights that hospital characteristics, such as overall and TBI volume, influence the timing of VTEPPx and that earlier administration is linked to improved patient survival.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Despite cost-standardization efforts, significant variations in hospital costs persist in insurance claims. We sought to identify and quantify factors driving cost variability at hospital and cost center levels following a complex gastrointestinal surgical procedure.

Methods: Individuals who underwent pancreatectomy (PA), colectomy (CO), and proctectomy (PR) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trends in candidate hepatitis C virus nucleic acid amplification test (NAT)+ listing and associated impacts on liver transplantation waitlist outcomes.

Am J Transplant

October 2024

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • Direct-acting antiviral agents have increased the number of patients listed for liver transplantation using hepatitis C virus-positive organs, with a significant jump from 8.8% to 60.8% between 2016 and 2023.
  • Patients listed for HCV NAT-positive organs have shown improved waitlist survival, with a notable reduction in overall mortality compared to those not listed for these organs.
  • Despite the overall increase in listings for HCV NAT-positive organs, disparities still exist based on transplant center practices and geographic locations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risk-adjusted quality measures are used to evaluate healthcare providers with respect to national norms while controlling for factors beyond their control. Existing healthcare provider profiling approaches typically assume that the between-provider variation in these measures is entirely due to meaningful differences in quality of care. However, in practice, much of the between-provider variation will be due to trivial fluctuations in healthcare quality, or unobservable confounding risk factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!