Background: Using a nationally representative database, the present study evaluated the degree of center-level variation in the cost of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Methods: All adults undergoing elective, isolated TAVR were identified in the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with hospitalization costs. The random intercept for each hospital was generated and considered to be the baseline cost attributable to care at each center. Hospitals in the highest decile of baseline costs were classified as high-cost hospitals. The association of high-cost hospital status with in-hospital mortality and perioperative complications was subsequently assessed.
Results: An estimated 119,492 patients, with a mean age of 80 years and a 45.9% prevalence of female sex, met the study criteria. Analysis of random intercepts indicated that 54.3% of variability in costs was attributable to interhospital differences rather than patient factors. Perioperative respiratory failure, neurologic complications, and acute kidney injury were associated with increased episodic expenditure but did not explain the observed center-level variation. The baseline cost associated with each hospital ranged from -$26,000 to $162,000. Notably, high-cost hospital status was not linked to annual TAVR caseload or to odds of mortality (P = .83), acute kidney injury (P = .18), respiratory failure (P = .32), or neurologic complications (P = .55).
Conclusions: The present analysis identified significant variation in the cost of TAVR, which was largely attributable to center-level rather than patient factors. Hospital TAVR volume and occurrence of complications were not drivers of the observed variation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.03.013 | DOI Listing |
J Heart Lung Transplant
December 2024
The Heart Center, Heart Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Background: A pediatric national heart review board (NHRB) and exception guidance document to standardize decision-making were implemented in 2021 to reduce variability and ensure equity in status exceptions for pediatric candidates. We evaluated the hypothesis that these changes decreased center variability and racial disparities within the granted exceptions.
Methods: Guidance document and pediatric NHRB were operational by February and June 2021, respectively.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
November 2024
From the Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB) (T.N.C., A.V., J.B., N.Y.C., P.B.), David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California; Department of Surgery (A.S., G.B.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; and Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery (P.B.), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Ann Surg Oncol
November 2024
Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Introduction: Despite cost-standardization efforts, significant variations in hospital costs persist in insurance claims. We sought to identify and quantify factors driving cost variability at hospital and cost center levels following a complex gastrointestinal surgical procedure.
Methods: Individuals who underwent pancreatectomy (PA), colectomy (CO), and proctectomy (PR) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.
Am J Transplant
October 2024
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address:
Ann Appl Stat
March 2024
Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Risk-adjusted quality measures are used to evaluate healthcare providers with respect to national norms while controlling for factors beyond their control. Existing healthcare provider profiling approaches typically assume that the between-provider variation in these measures is entirely due to meaningful differences in quality of care. However, in practice, much of the between-provider variation will be due to trivial fluctuations in healthcare quality, or unobservable confounding risk factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!