Objective: Presurgical high-density electric source imaging (hdESI) of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) is only used by few epilepsy centers. One obstacle is the time-consuming workflow both for recording as well as for visual review. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of (a) an automated IED detection and (b) the number of IEDs on the accuracy of hdESI and time-effectiveness.
Methods: In 22 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy receiving epilepsy surgery (Engel 1) we retrospectively detected IEDs both visually and semi-automatically using the EEG analysis software Persyst in 256-channel EEGs. The amount of IEDs, the Euclidean distance between hdESI maximum and resection zone, and the operator time were compared. Additionally, we evaluated the intra-individual effect of IED quantity on the distance between hdESI maximum of all IEDs and hdESI maximum when only a reduced amount of IEDs were included.
Results: There was no significant difference in the number of IEDs between visually versus semi-automatically marked IEDs (74 ± 56 IEDs/patient vs 116 ± 115 IEDs/patient). The detection method of the IEDs had no significant effect on the mean distances between resection zone and hdESI maximum (visual: 26.07 ± 31.12 mm vs semi-automated: 33.6 ± 34.75 mm). However, the mean time needed to review the full datasets semi-automatically was shorter by 275 ± 46 min (305 ± 72 min vs 30 ± 26 min, P < 0.001). The distance between hdESI of the full versus reduced amount of IEDs of the same patient was smaller than 1 cm when at least a mean of 33 IEDs were analyzed. There was a significantly shorter intraindividual distance between resection zone and hdESI maximum when 30 IEDs were analyzed as compared to the analysis of only 10 IEDs (P < 0.001).
Significance: Semi-automatized processing and limiting the amount of IEDs analyzed (~30-40 IEDs per cluster) appear to be time-saving clinical tools to increase the practicability of hdESI in the presurgical work-up.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472417 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12732 | DOI Listing |
Clin Neurophysiol
December 2023
University Medical Center Göttingen, Clinic for Neurology, 37075 Göttingen, Germany. Electronic address:
Objective: To determine the effect of inverse methods and timepoints of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) used for high-density electric source imaging (hd-ESI) in pharmacoresistant focal epilepsies.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the hd-ESI and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) of 21 operated patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy (Engel I). Volumetric hd-ESI was performed with three different inverse methods such as the inverse solution linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV, a beamformer method), standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) and weighted minimum-norm estimation (wMNE) and at different IED phases.
Epilepsia Open
September 2023
Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Objective: Presurgical high-density electric source imaging (hdESI) of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) is only used by few epilepsy centers. One obstacle is the time-consuming workflow both for recording as well as for visual review. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of (a) an automated IED detection and (b) the number of IEDs on the accuracy of hdESI and time-effectiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!