AI Article Synopsis

  • * Results showed similar success rates in both groups (about 66.7%) for pain relief after three and six months, with a median time to pain recurrence being slightly longer for the CRF group.
  • * However, the CPRF group reported fewer postoperative side effects like numbness and hypersensitivity compared to the CRF group, suggesting a potential benefit of the combined treatment.

Article Abstract

Background: Continuous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can effectively manage cervical facet joint pain related to neuropathic symptoms in the post-radiofrequency period. Additionally, pulse radiofrequency (PRF) provides relief of neuropathic symptoms. However, the effect of combined RFA and PRF has yet to be determined.

Objectives: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of RFA (CRF group) and combined RFA and PRF (CPRF group).

Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with cervical facet joint pain undergoing RFA between June 1, 2014, and June 1, 2017, or combined RFA and PRF between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2020, at a pain research center. Thirty-nine consecutive patients identified from charts meeting the inclusion criteria were included and classified in CRF (n = 22) and CPRF groups (n = 17). The results were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and neck pain disability index (NDI) before procedures and 1, 3, and 6 months after the injections. Successful treatment was expressed as at least 80% pain relief from baseline and NDI score <15 points. The duration of pain relief was expressed as the period between pain relief and pain reoccurrence to 50% of the preprocedural pain level. The primary outcome was successful treatment in the groups, and the secondary outcome was the duration of pain relief and post-cervical radiofrequency side effects in the groups.

Results: Fourteen (66.7%) patients in the CRF group and 12 (66.7%) in the CPRF group experienced successful treatment at three and six-month follow-ups (P > 0.05). The median time to the reoccurrence of at least 50% of preprocedural pain level was 303.8 days in the CRF group and 270 days in the CPRF group (P = 0.395). However, the CPRF group showed significantly less postoperative numbness, dysesthesia, and hypersensitivity syndrome than the CRF group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Combined RFA and PRF can be complementary treatment for cervical facet joint pain, providing an adequate success rate and duration of pain relief as RFA alone but with significantly fewer post-radiofrequency side effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016117PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm-129747DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical facet
16
facet joint
16
joint pain
16
combined rfa
16
rfa prf
16
crf group
12
pain
9
continuous radiofrequency
8
radiofrequency ablation
8
side effects
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!