The identification of specific learning disabilities (SLD) remains fraught with controversy and uncertainty about professionals' capacity to appropriately identify special education eligibility. For students from linguistically minoritized backgrounds, the prohibits the identification of learning difficulties primarily attributable to contextual or linguistic factors. Yet the ambiguity of the federal language may hinder application, making critical states' interpretation and corresponding guidance for professional practice in eligibility determination. In this archival study, we systematically reviewed state departments' education policies and related guidance on the identification of multilingual learners with SLD, with a focus on how states have articulated policies and procedures related to the federal exclusionary clause. Our findings demonstrate variability and depth of information across states pertaining to guidance regarding the exclusionary clause. Implications for practice and policy are provided.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194231158070DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

policies guidance
8
guidance identification
8
linguistically minoritized
8
specific learning
8
learning disabilities
8
exclusionary clause
8
review state
4
state policies
4
guidance
4
identification
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Patient and public involvement is regarded as vital in fostering high-quality care. While involvement has clear societal advantages, it is still widely viewed as tokenistic and surrounded by issues of representation. This study aims to understand how patients and informal caregivers can be trained to effectively contribute to improved quality of healthcare services.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Protocol to assess bottlenecks inhibiting the scaling up of evidence-based family planning practices in low-income and middle-income countries using mixed methods.

BMJ Open

December 2024

Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Introduction: Scaling up evidence-based practices (EBPs) in family planning (FP), as recommended by the WHO, has increasingly been accepted by global health actors as core to their mission, goals and activities. National policies, strategies, guidance, training materials, political commitment and donor support exist in many countries to adopt and scale up a range of EBPs, including postpregnancy FP, task sharing for FP and the promotion of social and behaviour change (SBC) for FP. While there has been some success in implementing these practices, coverage remains inadequate in many countries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Healthcare ethics and artificial intelligence: a UK doctor survey.

BMJ Open

December 2024

Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Department of Law, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Article Synopsis
  • The study surveyed 272 UK doctors about their use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, focusing on their knowledge, concerns, and views on regulation.
  • Most doctors felt they had limited knowledge of AI, with men rating themselves higher than women, and younger doctors in training were more likely to use AI compared to more experienced doctors.
  • Concerns about AI included patient safety and confidentiality, leading to a strong call from doctors for more regulatory guidelines from professional bodies regarding AI usage in their practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Snakebite envenomation has been declared a neglected tropical disease by the WHO since 2017. The disease is endemic in affected areas due to the lack of availability and access to antivenom, despite it being the standard treatment for snakebites. This challenge is perpetuated by the shortcomings of the regulatory systems and policies governing the management of antivenoms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Efforts to minimise inequity in palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) are well-researched. This is frequently explained by differences related to singular factors. The concept of intersectionality recognises that the combination of variables exacerbates disparities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!