AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a deep-learning contrast-boosting algorithm on low-dose CT scans in patients at high risk for liver cancer (HCC), focusing on image quality and how well lesions are displayed.* -
  • Participants underwent CT scans using two different protocols: a standard-dose (SD) and a double-low-dose (DLD) protocol, with analyses revealing that the DLD protocol used less radiation and contrast agent while still achieving better contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for vessels.* -
  • Ultimately, the deep-learning algorithm improved image quality without reducing the ability to detect liver lesions, indicating that it could be a safer option for high-risk patients needing imaging.*

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the image quality and lesion conspicuity of a deep-learning-based contrast-boosting (DL-CB) algorithm on double-low-dose (DLD) CT of simultaneous reduction of radiation and contrast doses in participants at high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Participants were recruited and underwent four-phase dynamic CT (NCT04722120). They were randomly assigned to either standard-dose (SD) or DLD protocol. All CT images were initially reconstructed using iterative reconstruction, and the images of the DLD protocol were further processed using the DL-CB algorithm (DLD-DL). The primary endpoint was the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the secondary endpoint was qualitative image quality (noise, hepatic lesion, and vessel conspicuity), and the tertiary endpoint was lesion detection rate. The t-test or repeated measures analysis of variance was used for analysis.

Results: Sixty-eight participants with 57 focal liver lesions were enrolled (20 with HCC and 37 with benign findings). The DLD protocol had a 19.8% lower radiation dose (DLP, 855.1 ± 254.8 mGy·cm vs. 713.3 ± 94.6 mGy·cm, p = .003) and 27% lower contrast dose (106.9 ± 15.0 mL vs. 77.9 ± 9.4 mL, p < .001) than the SD protocol. The comparative analysis demonstrated that CNR (p < .001) and portal vein conspicuity (p = .002) were significantly higher in the DLD-DL than in the SD protocol. There was no significant difference in lesion detection rate for all lesions (82.7% vs. 73.3%, p = .140) and HCCs (75.7% vs. 70.4%, p = .644) between the SD protocol and DLD-DL.

Conclusions: DL-CB on double-low-dose CT provided improved CNR of the aorta and portal vein without significant impairment of the detection rate of HCC compared to the standard-dose acquisition, even in participants at high risk for HCC.

Key Points: • Deep-learning-based contrast-boosting algorithm on double-low-dose CT provided an improved contrast-to-noise ratio compared to standard-dose CT. • The detection rate of focal liver lesions was not significantly differed between standard-dose CT and a deep-learning-based contrast-boosting algorithm on double-low-dose CT. • Double-low-dose CT without a deep-learning algorithm presented lower CNR and worse image quality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09520-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dld protocol
12
participants high-risk
8
high-risk hepatocellular
8
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
image quality
8
dl-cb algorithm
8
low dose
4
contrast
4
dose contrast
4
contrast agent
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!