A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Managing Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Exposure in Adult Patients: Surgical Options and Implant Removal Prevention. | LitMetric

Background: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt exposure is rare. Small series reporting on managing this complication mainly focus on the pediatric population, where wound breaks over cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chambers are observed most frequently. However, case series on adult patients are missing.

Methods: Between June 2004 and December 2019, 18 patients underwent VP shunt revision due to implant exposure. Pertinent data were retrospectively collected from the hospital database. Their full clinical history, laboratory values, neuroradiological imaging, pretreatment CSF characteristics, photographic and video material, and surgery types were reviewed.

Results: The ventricular catheter was exposed in 8 patients (the frontal region in 6 and the occipital region in 2), the valve chamber at the retroauricular region in 6, the shunt tube in 7 (at the neck in 4, the supraclavicular region in 2, and the abdominal incision in 1). Multiple exposure sites were found in 2 cases. Two patients with CSF infections benefitted from system removal and temporary external ventricular drainage until infection control was achieved. The remaining 16 patients underwent on-ward revision (wound curettage, skin mobilisation, and resuture over the exposed part of the shunt), which was effective in 14 patients, but further revision was required in 2 patients.

Conclusions: While rare, VP shunt exposure is a serious complication. In our experience, a prompt and accurate on-ward revision could save the implant in most patients without CSF infections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shunt exposure
12
ventriculoperitoneal shunt
8
patients
8
adult patients
8
patients underwent
8
patients csf
8
csf infections
8
on-ward revision
8
shunt
6
exposure
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!