AI Article Synopsis

  • Microsurgical reconstruction after unilateral radiation for breast cancer can lead to perceived asymmetry, even with non-radiated tissue.
  • A study involving photos of 16 patients found that most laypersons thought the radiated breast looked smaller, with a significant link between flap weight differences and perceptions of size and aesthetics.
  • Experts also noted the radiated breast appeared smaller, but they recognized larger flaps on the radiated side led to better aesthetic evaluations, highlighting the need for refined surgical techniques to improve outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background:  Microsurgical reconstruction for bilateral mastectomy defects after unilateral radiation often results in asymmetry, despite both flap tissues never being radiated.

Methods:  Photos of 16 patients who received prior radiation to one breast and underwent bilateral abdominal free flap reconstruction were taken postoperatively. Layperson and expert assessment were attained via online crowdsourcing and a panel of attending surgeons and senior residents. Stratification by interflap weight differences was done for subanalysis.

Results:  A total of 399 laypersons responded, with the majority (57.3%) reporting that the radiated breast appeared smaller than the nonradiated breast. When the photos were stratified by interflap weight differences, the photos with the radiated side flap weight over 3% more than nonradiated side were significantly more likely to be perceived by laypersons as the same size (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7;  < 0.001) and of similar aesthetic (OR = 1.9;  < 0.001) when compared with photos with same-sized flaps. Of the expert responses ( = 16), the radiated side was perceived as smaller 72.3% of the time and the nonradiated side appeared more aesthetic 52.7% of the time. Contrary to layperson responses, the experts tend to report the radiated side as smaller despite varying flap weight. Interestingly, expert raters were significantly more likely to rate the flaps of equal aesthetics when the radiated side has a flap larger by 3% or more (OR = 3.6;  < 0.001).

Conclusion:  Higher aesthetic scores were noted when larger flaps were inset to the radiated envelope by both laypersons and experts, suggesting potential technical refinement in reconstructive outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2056-1991DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

free flap
8
interflap weight
8
weight differences
8
visual perception
4
breast
4
perception breast
4
breast free
4
flap
4
flap size
4
size influenced
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!