Can we improve the usefulness of the diuretic renogram in the diagnosis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children? Introduction of mercaptoacetyltriglycine-suspected obstruction scoring system (MAG-SOS).

Introduction: Mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) renogram is one of the gold standard diagnostic tools of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO); however, there is no widely agreed indications of pyeloplasty based on MAG-3 findings. In this study, we introduce a renogram scoring system that can help improve the prognostic value of MAG-3 renogram and in the decision making of pyeloplasty.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive pyeloplasties for antenatal hydronephrosis from 2010 to 2020. A control group was included of non-operatively managed SFU grade 3 and 4. The initial renal ultrasound and preoperative MAG-3 Lasix renogram were reviewed for differential renal function (DRF), type of renogram curve and tracer washout half-time (T). A ROC curve was used to evaluate the cut-off points that can be associated with obstruction. A multivariate linear regression model was used to assess the best renogram parameter that can predict surgical intervention.

Results: We included 188 patients with 209 renal units. The median age for pyeloplasty was 5.4 months. The mercaptoacetyltriglycine-Suspected Obstruction Scoring System (MAG-SOS) was associated with pyeloplasty (AUC = 0.97, P < 0.001) (Figure A). A score of 5 is 100% specific for obstruction. 78% of units required surgical intervention had a MAG-SOS score of≥5 while all units of the control group had a range of score 0-4. Using the multivariate analysis, the MAG-SOS system showed to the only independent predictor for pyeloplasty (HR = 0.03, p < 0.001).

Discussion: This study has some limitations. Firstly, the retrospective nature of the cohort; however, all patients were reviewed by one investigator who was blinded to the line of management. This is a single institutional study; therefor, this MAG-SOS should be evaluated by other centers to ensure its efficiency. Lastly, the pyeloplasty decision was taken by 3 different urologists; nevertheless, all of them adopt the same indications which are similar to those of the Society for Pediatric Urology and the Canadian Urological Association guidelines.

Conclusion: The MAG-SOS system showed to be a useful tool that can predict pyeloplasty. A score of 5 has 100% specificity for patients having a pyeloplasty performed. Prospective studies are required to confirm the usefulness of this novel tool.