Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2169399DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bioethicists divided
4
divided reproductive
4
reproductive testing
4
testing non-medical
4
non-medical traits
4
traits emerging
4
emerging perspectives
4
perspectives polygenic
4
polygenic scores
4
bioethicists
1

Similar Publications

Experts' perspectives on human gene editing in Switzerland.

J Community Genet

December 2024

Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Health Sciences and Technologies Department ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Despite many specialized studies on the views of the public or stakeholders who face inherited conditions that may be treatable by HGE, limited studies have focused on experts' views towards Human Gene Editing (HGE). Therefore, in this study we conducted exploratory interviews with 14 experts (scientists, clinicians, social scientists, lawyers) in Switzerland to assess their views towards HGE and how they expect the Swiss public to view HGE. We found general acceptance of Somatic Gene Editing (SGE), but opinions towards Germline Gene Editing (GGE) were more divided.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • James Rachels' 1975 article 'Active and Passive Euthanasia' introduced the Bare Difference Argument, a key tool in ethical reasoning about euthanasia.
  • The argument struggles to demonstrate that active euthanasia is morally acceptable because it misuses intuitions from cases where letting a person die is considered wrong.
  • This raises concerns about how philosophical bioethics approaches the topic of assisted dying, highlighting difficulties in creating effective analogies and the limitations of ethical reasoning in this context.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Implementation science presents ethical issues not well addressed by traditional research ethics frameworks. There is little empirical work examining how clinicians whose work is affected by implementation studies view these issues. Accordingly, we interviewed clinicians working at sites participating in an implementation study seeking to improve patient handoffs to the intensive care unit (ICU).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ethicizing history. Bioethical representations of Nazi medicine.

Bioethics

July 2023

Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, USA.

The article presents and analyzes different approaches of U.S. bioethicists in comprehending the Nazi medical crimes after 1945.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!