A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Use of the quantitative antibiogram method for assessing nosocomial transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales in a French hospital. | LitMetric

Use of the quantitative antibiogram method for assessing nosocomial transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales in a French hospital.

J Hosp Infect

CHU Rennes, Service de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, Rennes, France; INSERM, Bacterial RNAs and Medicine, University Rennes, UMR_S 1230, Rennes, France. Electronic address:

Published: May 2023

Background: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (eESBL) have high prevalence in hospitals, but real-time monitoring of nosocomial acquisition through conventional typing methods is challenging. Moreover, patient-to-patient transmission varies between the main species, namely Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which draws into question the relevance of applying identical preventive measures.

Aim: To detect eESBL cross-transmission events (CTEs) using the quantitative antibiogram (QA) method in combination with epidemiological data (combined QA method), and to determine the effectiveness of standard or contact precautions for eESBL species.

Methods: First, a validation set was used to compare the relevance of the combined QA method with a combination of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and epidemiological data (combined PFGE method). Next, a 4-year retrospective analysis was conducted to detect eESBL CTEs in hospitalized patients. Two species were screened - ESBL E. coli (ESBL-Ec) and ESBL K. pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp). During the study, standard precautions alone were applied to patients with ESBL-Ec, whereas contact precautions were applied for patients with ESBL-Kp.

Findings: As a proof of concept, use of the combined QA method and the combined PFGE method for the detection of CTEs gave identical results for E. coli, and similar results for at least 75% of K. pneumoniae. Overall, 722 patients with ESBL-Ec isolates and 280 patients with ESBL-Kp isolates were included in the retrospective analysis. Nine and 23 CTEs were identified for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively, involving 20 (2.7%) and 36 (12.8%) patients, respectively.

Conclusion: The combined QA method constitutes a rapid tool for epidemiological surveillance to detect CTEs. In the study hospital, standard precautions are sufficient to prevent acquisition of ESBL-Ec, whereas contact precautions must be implemented to prevent acquisition of ESBL-Kp.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2023.01.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

combined method
16
contact precautions
12
quantitative antibiogram
8
method
8
antibiogram method
8
detect eesbl
8
method combination
8
epidemiological data
8
data combined
8
combined pfge
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!