Movement Onset Detection Methods: A Comparison Using Force Plate Recordings.

J Appl Biomech

Department of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON,Canada.

Published: April 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Computational methods for detecting movement onset improve analysis efficiency and consistency by automating the process and allowing for better assessment of biomechanical signals.
  • The study evaluates and compares the effectiveness of the 5 times the standard deviation (5 × SD) method against variations of the reverse scanning and first derivative methods, using manual onset selection as a benchmark.
  • Results indicate that the first derivative method with a 10-Hz low-pass filter provides the most accurate onset detection for countermovement jumps and squats, minimizing the impact of high-frequency noise and variations in the quiet phase prior to movement onset.

Article Abstract

Computational approaches for movement onset detection can standardize and automate analyses to improve repeatability, accessibility, and time efficiency. With the increasing interest in assessing time-varying biomechanical signals such as force-time recordings, there remains a need to investigate the recently adopted 5 times the standard deviation (5 × SD) threshold method. In addition, other employed methods and their variations such as the reverse scanning and first derivative methods have been scarcely evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the 5 × SD threshold method, 3 variations of the reverse scanning method, and 5 variations of the first derivative method against manually selected onsets, in the countermovement jump and squat. Limits of agreement with respect to onsets, manually selected from unfiltered data, were best for the first derivative method using a 10-Hz low-pass filter (limits of agreement: -0.02 to 0.05 s and -0.07 to 0.11 s for the countermovement jump and squat, respectively). Thus, even when the onset of unfiltered data is of primary interest, filtering before calculating the first derivative is necessary as it reduces the amplification of high frequencies. The first derivative approach is also less susceptible to inherent variation during the quiet phase prior to the onset compared to the other approaches investigated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.2022-0111DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

movement onset
8
onset detection
8
threshold method
8
variations reverse
8
reverse scanning
8
method variations
8
derivative method
8
manually selected
8
countermovement jump
8
jump squat
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!