A comparison of outcomes for above-knee-amputation and arthrodesis for the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Introduction: Several strategies have been shown to have some efficacy in the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA): chronic antibiotic suppression, a second two-stage revision, arthrodesis, and above-the-knee amputation (AKA). We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of these treatments in patients who had previously received a two-stage revision.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed which investigated PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. Chronic infection was defined as a persistent infection of a TKA after a previous two-stage revision. Studies were independently evaluated by two reviewers. Quality appraisal was performed using MINORS Criteria.

Results: 14 studies were included for the final review. For chronically infected TKA, a second two-stage revision was often sufficient to control infection. If revision failed, the most common next procedure was either a repeat revision or AKA. AKA patients had less pain and higher quality of life scores compared to arthrodesis, but a higher five-year mortality rate.

Discussion And Conclusion: Chronic infection in TKA offers a multitude of challenges for orthopedic surgeons. We found that arthrodesis and AKA were not significantly different in rates of infection eradication or quality of life. We recommend clinicians to actively discuss options with patients to find a procedure most suitable for them.