A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The floating hip injury: a descriptive study and case-control analysis. | LitMetric

The floating hip injury: a descriptive study and case-control analysis.

Hip Int

Cambridge Orthopaedic Pelvic Unit (COPU), Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Published: January 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • A "floating hip" injury happens when someone has both a broken thigh bone (femur) and a broken hip bone at the same time, which is pretty rare.
  • In a study, doctors looked at medical records of patients with these injuries from 2015 to 2020 and compared them to other patients with hip fractures that didn’t involve the femur.
  • They found that patients with floating hip injuries needed more surgery, stayed in the hospital longer, and had more complications after surgery than those without femur injuries.

Article Abstract

Purpose: A "floating hip" (FH) injury is a rare injury describing the simultaneous ipsilateral fracture of the femur and pelvis or acetabulum (P/A). We describe our experience with patients presenting with FH injuries and compare them to controls with similar P/A fractures but without femoral involvement.

Methods: Medical records and radiographs of FH patients and controls presenting to our tertiary centre between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. Follow-up data from outpatient clinical records were also extracted. The control group were extensively matched by age, sex, body mass index, fracture classification and energy of injury.

Results: From 1392 recorded P/A fractures, 42 FH cases were identified (average age 39 years, 78.6% males). The most common femoral fracture was the midshaft (35.7%), followed by the neck of femur (26.2%). 90.5% of FH injuries were due to high-energy mechanisms. 64.3% of P/A fractures, and 100% of femoral fractures were managed surgically. Compared to controls, FH cases were more likely to have additional orthopaedic injuries (73.8% vs. 40.5%,   0.002), more total theatre admissions (mean 2.5 vs. 1.19,   0.001), longer hospital stays (28.3 vs. 14.9 days,   0.02), and a higher rates of post-op complications (53.8% vs. 20%,   0.025).

Conclusions: We report differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes of FH injuries versus controls, even after extensive matching for confounders. These differences may inform future treatment strategies for the FH injury.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10787386PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11207000231160075DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

p/a fractures
12
floating hip
4
injury
4
hip injury
4
injury descriptive
4
descriptive study
4
study case-control
4
case-control analysis
4
analysis purpose
4
purpose "floating
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!