Objective: To create and assess the validity of a high-fidelity, three dimensional (3D) printed, flexible ureteroscopy simulator resulting from a real case.
Methods: A patient's CT scan was segmented to obtain a 3D model in .stl format, including the urinary bladder, ureter and renal cavities. The file was printed and a kidney stone was introduced into the cavities. The simulated surgery consisted of monobloc stone extraction. Nineteen participants split into 3 groups according to their level (6 medical students, 7 residents and 6 urology fellows) performed the procedure twice at a 1-month interval. They were rated according to a global score and a task-specific score, based on an anonymized, timed video recording.
Results: Participants demonstrated a significant improvement between the 2 assessments, both on the global score (29.4 vs 21.9 points out of 35; P < .001) and the task-specific score (17.7 vs 14.7 points out of 20; P < .001) as well as procedure time (498.5 vs 700 seconds; P = .001). Medical students showed the greatest progress for the global score (+15.5 points (mean), P = .001) and the task-specific score (+6.5 points (mean), P < .001). 69.2% of participants considered the model as visually quite realistic or highly realistic and all of them judged it quite or extremely interesting for intern training purposes.
Conclusion: Our 3D printed ureteroscopy simulator was able to enhance the progress of medical students who are new to endoscopy, whilst being valid and reasonably priced. It could become part of a training program in urology, in line with the latest recommendations for surgical education.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.039 | DOI Listing |
BMC Urol
November 2024
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan Second Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Objective: To compare intrarenal pressure (IRP) and irrigation flow by varying suspended water heights and hand-held pressure pumping during flexible ureteroscopy using an in vitro 3D printed kidney model.
Methods: A 3D-printed silicone model was used to simulate the kidney. The ureteral access sheath(UAS) was connected to the kidney model and positioned at the ureteropelvic junction.
J Endourol
December 2024
Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Optical tracking (OT) has shown potential in assessing surgical skill but has yet to be evaluated for endoscopic urologic surgery. We sought to evaluate the potential for OT to distinguish expert and trainee surgeons during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for kidney stone treatment in both simulated and live surgical settings. We performed OT analysis of six surgeons performing stone localization during fURS in two settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrologie
November 2024
Klinik für Urologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Investig Clin Urol
July 2024
Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Kidney stones require surgical removal when they grow too large to be broken up externally or to pass on their own. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is also sometimes treated endoscopically in a similar procedure. These surgeries are difficult, particularly for trainees who often miss tumours, stones or stone fragments, requiring re-operation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!