Examining agreement between finite element modelling methodologies in predicting pathological fracture risk in proximal femurs with bone metastases.

Background: Finite element modelling methodologies available for assessing femurs with metastases accurately predict strength and pathological fracture risk which has led them to being considered for implementation into the clinic. However, the models available use varying material models, loading conditions, and critical thresholds. The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between finite element modelling methodologies in assessing fracture risk in proximal femurs with metastases.

Methods: CT images of the proximal femur were obtained of 7 patients who presented with a pathologic femoral fracture (fracture group) and the contralateral femur of 11 patients scheduled for prophylactic surgery (non-fracture group). Fracture risk was predicted for each patient following three established finite modelling methodologies which have previously shown to accurately predict strength and determine fracture risk: non-linear isotropic -based model, strain fold ratio -based model, Hoffman failure criteria -based model.

Findings: The methodologies demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy in assessing fracture risk (AUC = 0.77, 0.73, and 0.67). There was a stronger monotonic association between the non-linear isotropic and Hoffman -based models (τ = 0.74) than with the strain fold ratio model (τ = -0.24 and - 0.37). There was moderate or low agreement between methodologies in discriminating between individuals at high or low risk of fracture (κ = 0.20, 0.39, and 0.62).

Interpretation: The present results suggest there may be a lack of consistency in the management of pathological fractures in the proximal femur based on the finite element modelling methodologies.