Comparison of MBR and MBBR followed by UV or electrochemical disinfection for decentralized greywater treatment.

Water Res

Center for Microbial Ecology & Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Frieda Saeysstraat 1, Ghent 9052, Belgium; Center for Advanced Process Technology for Urban Resource Recovery (CAPTURE), Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Frieda Saeysstraat 1, 9052, Belgium. Electronic address:

Published: May 2023

Greywater is an attractive source for water reuse at the household or building level, particularly for non-potable applications. Two greywater treatment approaches are membrane bioreactors (MBR) and moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR), yet, their performance has not been compared so far within their respective treatment flowsheets, including post-disinfection. Two lab-scale treatment trains were operated on synthetic greywater: a) MBR with either polymeric (chlorinated polyethylene, C-PE, 165 days) or ceramic (silicon carbide, SiC, 199 days) membranes coupled with UV disinfection; and b) single-stage (66 days) or two-stage (124 days) MBBR coupled with an electrochemical cell (EC) for in-situ disinfectant generation. Water quality was constantly monitored, and Escherichia coli log removals were assessed through spike tests. Under low-flux operation of the MBR (<8 L·m  ·h  ), the SiC membranes delayed the onset of membrane fouling and needed less frequent cleaning compared to C-PE membranes. Both treatment systems met most water quality requirements for unrestricted greywater reuse, at a 10-fold lower reactor volume for the MBR than the MBBR. However, neither the MBR nor the two-staged MBBR allowed adequate nitrogen removal, and the MBBR did not consistently meet effluent chemical oxygen demand and turbidity requirements. Both EC and UV provided non-detectable E. coli concentrations in the effluent. Although the EC provided residual disinfection, scaling and fouling decreased its energetic and disinfection performance over time, making it less efficient than UV disinfection. Several outlines to improve the performance of both treatment trains and disinfection processes are proposed, thus, allowing a fit-for-use approach that leverages the advantages of the respective treatment trains. Results from this investigation will assist in elucidating the most efficient, robust, and low-maintenance technology and configurations for small-scale greywater treatment for reuse.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119818DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

greywater treatment
8
comparison mbr
4
mbr mbbr
4
mbbr electrochemical
4
electrochemical disinfection
4
disinfection decentralized
4
greywater
4
decentralized greywater
4
treatment
4
treatment greywater
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!