A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Biceps Tenodesis Better Improves the Shoulder Function Compared with Tenotomy for Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Lesions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. | LitMetric

Purpose: Surgical options for long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) lesions include tenotomy and tenodesis. This study aims to determine the optimal surgical strategy for LHBT lesions with updated evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Literature was retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science on 12 January 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical outcomes of tenotomy and tenodesis were pooled in the meta-analyses.

Results: Ten RCTs with 787 cases met the inclusion criteria, and were included in the meta-analysis. Constant scores (MD, -1.24; = 0.001), improvement of Constant scores (MD, -1.54; = 0.04), Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores (MD, -0.73; = 0.03) and improvement of SST ( < 0.05) were significantly better in patients with tenodesis. Tenotomy was associated with higher rates of Popeye deformity (OR, 3.34; < 0.001) and cramping pain (OR, 3.36; = 0.008]. No significant differences were noticed between tenotomy and tenodesis regarding pain ( = 0.59), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score ( = 0.42) and its improvement ( = 0.91), elbow flexion strength ( = 0.38), forearm supination strength ( = 0.68) and range of motion of shoulder external rotation ( = 0.62). Subgroup analyses showed higher Constant scores in all tenodesis types and significantly larger improvement of Constant scores regarding intracuff tenodesis (MD, -5.87; = 0.001).

Conclusions: According to the analyses of RCTs, tenodesis better improves shoulder function in terms of Constant scores and SST scores, and reduces the risk of Popeye deformity and cramping bicipital pain. Intracuff tenodesis might offer the best shoulder function as measured with Constant scores. However, tenotomy and tenodesis provide similar satisfactory results for pain relief, ASES score, biceps strength and shoulder range of motion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003204PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051754DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

constant scores
24
tenotomy tenodesis
16
shoulder function
12
randomised controlled
12
controlled trials
12
tenodesis
9
tenodesis better
8
better improves
8
improves shoulder
8
long head
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!