Objectives: To evaluate carotid body visibility in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) studies and to compare the results to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

Methods: Two observers separately evaluated MR and CT examinations of 58 patients. MR scans were acquired with contrast-enhanced isometric T1-weighted water-only Dixon sequence. CT examinations were performed 90 s after contrast agent administration. Carotid bodies' dimensions were noted and their volumes calculated. To quantify the agreement between both methods, Bland-Altman plots were computed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and its localization-oriented variant (LROC) curves were plotted.

Results: Of the 116 expected carotid bodies, 105 were found on CT and 103 on MR at least by a single observer. Significantly more findings were concordant in CT (92.2%) than in MR (83.6%). The mean carotid body volume was smaller in CT (19.4 mm) than in MR (20.8 mm). The inter-observer agreement on volumes was moderately good (ICC (2,k) 0.42, < 0.001), but with significant systematic error. The diagnostic performance of the MR method added up to 88.4% of the ROC's area under the curve and 78.0% in the LROC algorithm.

Conclusions: Carotid bodies can be visualized on contrast-enhanced MR with good accuracy and inter-observer agreement. Carotid bodies assessed on MR had similar morphology as described in anatomical studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000419PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050993DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carotid bodies
16
computed tomography
8
carotid body
8
inter-observer agreement
8
carotid
6
assessment carotid
4
bodies
4
bodies magnetic
4
magnetic resonance-a
4
resonance-a head-to-head
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!