A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Peer assessment of professionalism attributes. | LitMetric

Background: Peer assessment can support the development of professionalism by providing feedback that enables learners to reflect on their professional behavioural attributes.

Approach: We developed and implemented an innovative online peer assessment and feedback tool. Students were encouraged to nominate 12 peer assessors to anonymously conduct their assessment. Assessors were presented with a list of 32 adjectives that described professional behavioural attributes within four domains (integrity, conscientiousness, agreeableness and resilience) and asked to rate the student by selecting a minimum of two adjectives in each domain and to provide free-text comments. The feedback was presented as a collated word cloud and free-text comments. All students had the opportunity to discuss their profiles with a staff member.

Evaluation: Our mixed-methods evaluation found that all students participated, and they valued the peer assessment and feedback process. Although the assessment was formative and confidential, students were reluctant to provide negative comments about their peers. 'Disengaged', 'aloof' and 'argumentative' were the most likely negative adjectives that indicated students with low-level professionalism concerns.

Implications: Future development will focus on introducing students who can act as peer champions for the process and repeating the peer assessment over time to identify the change in professionalism development.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tct.13570DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peer assessment
20
professional behavioural
8
assessment feedback
8
free-text comments
8
peer
7
assessment
6
students
6
professionalism
4
assessment professionalism
4
professionalism attributes
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!