Objectives: Parenteral drug products should be essentially free from visible particulate contamination. To ensure this, every batch produced must be subject to a 100% visual inspection. Monograph 2.9.20 of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) describes a method for visual inspection of parenteral drug units in front of a black and white panel using a white light source. Nevertheless, several Dutch compounding pharmacies rely on an alternative method for visual inspection by means of polarised light. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of both methods.

Methods: Trained technicians in three different hospitals inspected a predetermined set of samples using both methods for visual inspection of parenteral drugs.

Results: The results of this study show that the alternative method for visual inspection yields a higher recovery than the Ph. Eur. method, while no significant difference in false positive results was found.

Conclusions: Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the alternative method for visual inspection by means of polarised light can very well replace the Ph. Eur. method in pharmacy practice, provided that local validation of the alternative method is performed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003633DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual inspection
24
alternative method
20
method visual
16
parenteral drug
12
eur method
12
polarised light
12
method
9
drug products
8
inspection parenteral
8
inspection polarised
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!