A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Diagnostic value of ultrasound evaluation of major salivary glands for Sjögren's syndrome based on the novel OMERACT scoring system. | LitMetric

Diagnostic value of ultrasound evaluation of major salivary glands for Sjögren's syndrome based on the novel OMERACT scoring system.

Eur J Radiol

Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. Electronic address:

Published: May 2023

Objective: The novel Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) scoring system was used to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of major salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) for Sjögren's syndrome (SS).

Materials And Methods: SGUS was performed on the parotid glands (PGs) and submandibular glands of 242 patients (145 patients with SS and 97 patients without SS) using the OMERACT scoring system (grade 0-3). We also evaluated the association of SGUS scores with unstimulated whole salivary flow rate (UWSF), stimulated whole salivary flow rate (SWSF), and labial salivary gland biopsy (LSGB) results.

Results: The SGUS scores were significantly higher for the SS group than for the non-SS group (p < 0.001). Using a cutoff value of 8 for the total score yielded the highest sensitivity (76%), specificity (90%), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC, 0.828). The correlation between SGUS scores and salivary gland function was moderate to good. A cutoff value of 10 for the total score was more effective in predicting SWSF outcomes than UWSF outcomes (sensitivity: 73% > 58%, specificity: 98% > 87%, and AUC: 0.856 > 0.723). The association of OMERACT scores with LSGB results was fair to moderate. Among 61 anti-SSA-negative patients, 17 had positive PG scores (including ten SS and seven non-SS patients), and 44 had negative PG scores (including 37 non-SS and seven SS patients).

Conclusion: The OMERACT scoring system had good sensitivity and excellent specificity, demonstrating excellent diagnostic potential for SS and efficacy in assessing salivary gland function. Negative SGUS results may help reduce unnecessary biopsies in anti-SSA-negative patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110765DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

omeract scoring
16
scoring system
16
salivary gland
12
major salivary
8
sjögren's syndrome
8
sgus scores
8
salivary flow
8
flow rate
8
anti-ssa-negative patients
8
scores including
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!