AI Article Synopsis

  • Resource differences between adjacent ecosystems can greatly affect the type and effectiveness of nutrients exchanged, known as subsidies.
  • The study developed a model to understand how changes in the quality of these subsidies, specifically the concentration of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in aquatic insects, impact the biomass and function of riparian ecosystems.
  • The findings suggest that higher quality subsidies improve the recycling processes more than production, indicating that increases in subsidy quality have significant effects on ecological dynamics, particularly in nutrient-sensitive environments.

Article Abstract

Resource quantity and quality can differ between adjacent ecosystems, and these differences can impact subsidies exchanged between ecosystems. The quantity and quality of subsidies are rapidly changing in response to stressors associated with global environmental change, but while we have models to predict the effects of changes in subsidy quantity, we currently lack models to predict the effects of changes in subsidy quality on recipient ecosystem functioning. We developed a novel model to predict the effects of subsidy quality on recipient ecosystem biomass distribution, recycling, production, and efficiency. We parameterized the model for a case study of a riparian ecosystem subsidized by pulsed emergent aquatic insects. In this case study we focused on a common measure of subsidy quality that differs between riparian and aquatic ecosystems: the higher content of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in aquatic ecosystems. We analyzed how changes in the PUFA concentration of aquatic subsidies affect the dynamics in biomass stocks and functions of the riparian ecosystem. We also conducted a global sensitivity analysis to identify key drivers of subsidy impacts. Our analysis showed that subsidy quality increased the functioning of the recipient ecosystem. Recycling increased more strongly than production per unit subsidy quality increase, meaning there was a threshold where an increase in subsidy quality led to stronger effects of subsidies on recycling relative to the production of the recipient ecosystem. Our predictions were most sensitive to basal nutrient input, highlighting the relevance of recipient ecosystem nutrient levels to understanding the effects of ecosystem connections. We argue that recipient ecosystems that rely on high-quality subsidies, such as aquatic-terrestrial ecotones, are highly sensitive to changes in subsidy-recipient ecosystem connections. Our novel model unifies the subsidy hypothesis and food quality hypothesis and provides testable predictions to understand the effects of ecosystem connections on ecosystem functioning under global changes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.4023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subsidy quality
28
recipient ecosystem
24
changes subsidy
12
quality recipient
12
ecosystem
12
ecosystem functioning
12
predict effects
12
ecosystem connections
12
subsidy
10
quality
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!